Understanding the Resolution Copper Project Land Swap
The Resolution Copper Project represents one of the most significant copper mining developments in the United States in decades. Jointly owned by mining giants Rio Tinto (55%) and BHP (45%), this ambitious venture aims to tap into a massive copper deposit located near Superior, Arizona, approximately 60 miles east of Phoenix. The project has the potential to produce up to 40 billion pounds of copper over its projected 40-year operational lifespan, making it one of the largest untapped copper resources in the world.
At the heart of the project's advancement lies a controversial land swap with the U.S. Forest Service. On April 17, 2025, the Forest Service announced its approval of this exchange, which would transfer approximately 2,400 acres of federal land in the Tonto National Forest to Resolution Copper in exchange for about 5,400 acres of private land owned by the company. This exchange is crucial for the project to proceed, as the copper deposit extends beneath Oak Flat, an area currently under federal protection.
The land swap has been in limbo for years due to various regulatory hurdles and legal challenges. Originally mandated by Congress in the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act, the exchange has faced repeated delays amid environmental concerns and strong tribal opposition challenges.
What is the Resolution Copper Project?
The Resolution Copper Project employs block cave mining, an underground mining technique that allows for the extraction of ore bodies that would be uneconomical to mine using conventional methods. This approach minimizes surface disturbance compared to open-pit mining but still represents a significant engineering undertaking, with mining activities planned to occur up to 7,000 feet below ground level.
The deposit itself is remarkable for both its size and grade. With an average copper grade of approximately 1.5% – significantly higher than many existing mines – Resolution could become a cornerstone of American copper production. The project is expected to directly create approximately 3,700 jobs during peak construction and sustain around 1,500 direct jobs during operations, with an estimated economic impact of $61 billion over the life of the mine.
"This project represents a generational opportunity to strengthen America's domestic copper supply at a time when demand for this critical mineral is projected to increase substantially," noted a Resolution Copper representative in a recent project update. "The copper produced would support America's transition to renewable energy and reduce dependence on foreign sources."
The Recent Forest Service Decision
The U.S. Forest Service's April 2025 announcement marks a pivotal moment for the project. The agency indicated it would approve the land swap for Resolution Copper project but with important caveats. First, it committed to republishing an environmental impact report within 60 days, addressing previous concerns raised about the thoroughness of environmental assessments.
Second, and perhaps most significantly, the Forest Service explicitly acknowledged the possibility of pausing the land swap if the U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear a related case brought by Native American tribes challenging the exchange. This unusual caveat highlights the continuing legal uncertainty surrounding the project.
"While we're proceeding with the approval process based on our assessment of the project's compliance with applicable laws and regulations, we recognize the ongoing judicial review and will respect the court's authority in this matter," stated a Forest Service spokesperson.
The decision comes after years of regulatory back-and-forth, including a 2021 withdrawal of a previously published Environmental Impact Statement by the Biden administration for additional review. This latest development suggests a potential path forward, albeit one still fraught with potential delays and challenges.
Native American Opposition to the Project
One of the most significant obstacles facing the Resolution Copper Project has been the steadfast opposition from Native American tribes, particularly the San Carlos Apache Tribe, who consider Oak Flat (known as Chi'chil Biłdagoteel in Apache) a sacred site central to their religious and cultural practices.
Cultural and Religious Concerns
For the Apache people, Oak Flat is not merely land with historical connections but an active site of prayer, ceremonies, and gathering of traditional medicines that has been used for thousands of years. The area hosts coming-of-age ceremonies for young Apache women and contains numerous culturally significant features including ancient oak groves, petroglyphs, and burial grounds.
"This isn't just about land," explained Wendsler Nosie Sr., former chairman of the San Carlos Apache Tribe and founder of Apache Stronghold, an advocacy group fighting to preserve Oak Flat. "This is about our identity as Apache people. When you destroy a place like Chi'chil Biłdagoteel, you're destroying a part of who we are."
The proposed mining operation would eventually create a subsidence crater approximately 1,000 feet deep and nearly two miles wide as the underground chambers collapse after ore extraction. This physical transformation of the landscape would permanently alter Oak Flat and, tribal representatives argue, destroy their ability to practice religious traditions that are location-specific and cannot be transferred elsewhere.
The tribes' concerns extend beyond the immediate Oak Flat area to include potential impacts on water resources, wildlife habitats, and archaeological sites throughout the region. More than a dozen tribes with historical connections to the area have expressed opposition to the project, emphasizing the cultural genocide they believe would result from the mine's development.
Legal Challenges
The legal battle over Resolution Copper has been protracted and complex. The nonprofit group Apache Stronghold has led litigation arguing that the land transfer violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) by substantially burdening their religious exercise without serving a compelling governmental interest.
After initially losing in district court, Apache Stronghold's case (Apache Stronghold v. United States) reached the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled against them in a 2-1 decision in June 2023. However, the dissenting opinion from Judge Marsha Berzon strongly criticized the majority's reasoning, suggesting the case raised significant questions about religious freedom protections.
The group has petitioned the Supreme Court to review the case, arguing that the Ninth Circuit's decision contradicts Supreme Court precedent on religious liberty protections. If the Court agrees to hear the case, the Forest Service has indicated it would pause the land swap process pending resolution – a significant acknowledgment of the legal uncertainty surrounding the project.
The case highlights fundamental tensions between tribal sovereignty, religious freedom, resource development, and federal land management that extend far beyond this specific project. Legal experts note that a Supreme Court ruling could have far-reaching implications for similar conflicts across the country.
The Economic Impact of Resolution Copper
As global demand for copper continues to rise, driven largely by renewable energy technologies and electric vehicles, the Resolution Copper project takes on strategic significance for both the American economy and the global copper market outlook.
Copper Production Potential
The Resolution Copper project's estimated production of 40 billion pounds of copper over its projected 40-year lifespan would make it one of the most productive copper mines in North American history. At full operation, the mine is expected to satisfy approximately 25% of U.S. copper demand, significantly reducing dependence on imports. Currently, the United States imports approximately 40% of its copper requirements.
The project takes on added importance in the context of copper's classification as a critical mineral by the U.S. Geological Survey. Copper's superior electrical conductivity makes it essential for renewable energy infrastructure – an average wind turbine contains approximately 4.7 tons of copper, while electric vehicles require 2-4 times more copper than conventional vehicles.
"The transition to clean energy will be incredibly copper-intensive," noted one metals analyst with expertise in critical minerals. "We're looking at potential global copper supply gaps of 4.7 million tons by 2030 if major new projects don't come online. Resolution would be a significant contributor to closing that gap."
The mine's development would also represent a significant technological achievement, as Resolution would be one of the deepest block cave mines in North America, showcasing advanced mining techniques and automation technologies that could influence future mining projects globally.
Market Implications
The Resolution Copper project advances amid a complex and evolving copper market outlook. While Citi analysts recently softened their previously bearish outlook on copper in the short term, the medium and long-term projections remain decidedly bullish across most major financial institutions.
Goldman Sachs has described copper as "the new oil," predicting prices could reach $15,000 per ton in the coming years (compared to approximately $10,000 currently) due to structural supply constraints and growing demand from electrification. The International Energy Agency estimates that a global transition to net-zero emissions would require a doubling of copper demand by 2040.
In this context, Resolution Copper represents a major potential source in an era of increasingly tight supply constraints. The project could help moderate price volatility and ensure more stable supply chains for U.S. manufacturers. The economic multiplier effects would be substantial, with an estimated $20 billion in federal and state tax payments over the life of the mine and approximately $61 billion in total economic impact.
However, market analysts caution that the project's uncertain timeline creates challenges for accurate supply forecasting. With potential Supreme Court intervention and additional regulatory steps still ahead, metal markets may continue to price in significant uncertainty regarding Rio Tinto's copper strategy and Resolution's contribution to global copper supply.
Environmental Review Process
The environmental assessment of the Resolution Copper project has been one of the most comprehensive and contested aspects of its development, involving multiple federal agencies, thousands of public comments, and several iterations of environmental impact statements.
Environmental Report Requirements
The Forest Service's commitment to republish an environmental report within 60 days represents a critical milestone in the project's regulatory journey. This report will build upon the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) published in 2019 and the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) briefly released in January 2021 before being withdrawn by the incoming Biden administration for additional review.
The environmental assessment must address numerous complex issues including:
- Groundwater impacts, with particular focus on how the block cave mining technique might affect regional aquifers and springs
- Surface water quality concerns, including potential for acid mine drainage and heavy metal contamination
- Air quality impacts from mining operations and processing facilities
- Wildlife habitat disruption, especially for endangered species
- Cultural resources preservation, including archaeological sites
- Post-mining land reclamation plans
- Tailings storage facility design and safety
Resolution Copper has proposed several mitigation measures to address environmental concerns, including advanced water treatment facilities, seepage collection systems, and extensive monitoring programs. The company has committed to using filtered tailings technology for a portion of its waste material, which reduces water content and improves stability compared to conventional tailings storage.
Environmental groups remain skeptical of these measures, particularly regarding water usage in an already drought-prone region. The mine is expected to require approximately 15,000 acre-feet of water annually at full operation, leading to concerns about depleting aquifers and reducing flows in regional streams and rivers.
Regulatory Timeline
The 60-day window for republishing the environmental report represents just one step in a complex regulatory process that has already stretched over more than a decade. Following the report's publication, there will likely be a public comment period, potential revisions, and final decisions by multiple federal agencies including the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Army Corps of Engineers.
Further complicating the timeline is the potential for Supreme Court intervention. If the Court agrees to hear Apache Stronghold's case challenging the land transfer, the Forest Service decision process would be paused pending resolution. Supreme Court cases typically take 7-9 months from acceptance to decision, potentially adding significant delays.
Even after these hurdles, Resolution Copper would still need to secure numerous permits at the federal, state, and local levels before construction could begin. These include air quality permits, water permits, mine plan approvals, and various operational authorizations that would likely take several additional years to complete.
"The environmental review process for major mining projects in the U.S. now averages 10-15 years," explained a mining policy expert. "Resolution Copper is following this pattern, highlighting the tension between mineral development and the thorough regulatory scrutiny that modern society demands."
The Broader Context of U.S. Mining Policy
The Resolution Copper project's advancement comes amid significant shifts in U.S. policy regarding critical minerals and resource development, reflecting growing concerns about supply chain security and economic competitiveness.
Critical Minerals Strategy
The U.S. has intensified efforts to secure domestic sources of critical minerals, with copper playing an increasingly central role in national security and clean energy transitions. The US Forest Service and land swap for Resolution Copper project aligns with these objectives, potentially providing a stable, domestic source of a mineral that has been identified as crucial for both economic and national security reasons.
This domestic push coincides with international efforts to diversify mineral supply chains away from geopolitical rivals. Recently, the U.S. signed minerals agreements with Ukraine and the Democratic Republic of Congo aimed at securing access to key minerals while promoting responsible mining decarbonisation trends. These agreements focus primarily on minerals like lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements, but they reflect the broader strategy of mineral diplomacy that also encompasses copper.
The Biden administration's 2022 invocation of the Defense Production Act to boost critical mineral production further underscores the growing recognition of minerals as strategic resources. This shift represents a notable evolution in U.S. resource policy, which has historically focused more on oil and gas than mineral resources.
"We're seeing a fundamental realignment of mineral policy in response to both climate goals and great power competition," noted a Washington-based policy analyst. "Projects like Resolution Copper are now viewed through multiple lenses – economic, environmental, and increasingly, geopolitical."
Regulatory Reform Efforts
The Resolution Copper project is advancing as jurisdictions across North America reconsider their approach to mining regulation. Ontario, Canada's mining heavyweight, recently promised to cut red tape for critical mining projects, aiming to reduce permitting timelines by up to 50% for priority minerals.
In the U.S., similar efforts to streamline permitting while maintaining environmental protections have gained bipartisan support, though specific approaches differ significantly. The previous Trump administration implemented numerous regulatory reforms aimed at expediting mining approvals, while the Biden administration has focused more on targeted acceleration of clean energy projects while maintaining environmental review standards.
This tension – between expediting approvals for strategically important projects and ensuring thorough environmental and cultural review – lies at the heart of the Resolution Copper controversy. The project has become emblematic of broader debates about the proper balance between resource development, environmental protection, and respect for indigenous rights.
The outcome of the Resolution Copper process may establish precedents for how similar conflicts are resolved in the future, particularly as demand for minerals critical to the energy transition continues to grow. As one mining investment guide observer noted, "How we handle Resolution Copper will tell us a lot about America's ability to balance competing priorities in an increasingly resource-constrained world."
FAQ About the Resolution Copper Project
What is the current status of the Resolution Copper project?
The U.S. Forest Service has announced it will approve the land swap needed for the project to proceed, with an environmental report to be republished within 60 days. However, the agency has indicated it may pause the process if the U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear a related case brought by Native American tribes challenging the land transfer.
Why is the land swap controversial?
Native American tribes, particularly the San Carlos Apache, oppose the project because they say it will destroy Oak Flat (Chi'chil Biłdagoteel), a site of cultural and religious significance where they have conducted ceremonies for generations. Environmental groups also oppose the project due to concerns about water usage, pollution risks, and habitat destruction.
How much copper could the mine produce?
The mine is estimated to produce up to 40 billion pounds of copper over a 40-year operational life, potentially satisfying approximately 25% of U.S. copper demand. This would make it one of the most productive copper mines in North American history.
Could the project still be delayed?
Yes, the Forest Service has explicitly stated it may pause the land swap if the U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Apache Stronghold's case challenging the legality of the land transfer. Additionally, the project faces numerous other regulatory hurdles and permit requirements before construction could begin.
Who owns the Resolution Copper project?
The project is jointly owned by Rio Tinto (ASX: RIO) with a 55% controlling interest and BHP (ASX: BHP) with a 45% stake. These are two of the world's largest mining companies, with extensive experience developing major copper projects globally.
Disclaimer: This article contains analysis and speculation regarding future copper markets and potential legal outcomes. The information presented should not be construed as investment advice. The Resolution Copper project remains subject to significant regulatory, legal, and market uncertainties that could substantially affect its timeline and economic impact.
Want to Capitalise on the Next Major Mineral Discovery?
Stay ahead of the market with instant notifications on significant ASX mineral discoveries through Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model, which transforms complex data into actionable insights. Understand why major discoveries like those from Rio Tinto and BHP can generate substantial returns by exploring Discovery Alert's dedicated discoveries page.
