How the Closure of the Strait of Hormuz Would Impact Global Energy

Why Is the Strait of Hormuz So Critical to Global Energy?

The Strait of Hormuz represents one of the world's most vital maritime chokepoints, connecting the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. This narrow waterway, spanning just 21 miles at its narrowest point, serves as the primary transit route for approximately 20% of the world's oil supplies and a significant portion of global liquefied natural gas (LNG).

"There are several important energy chokepoints around the world, but none is more significant and vulnerable than the Strait of Hormuz," notes energy analyst Robert Rapier, highlighting the strait's unparalleled importance to global energy security.

The strategic significance of this waterway cannot be overstated. Major oil producers including Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates rely heavily on the Strait to transport their petroleum products to global markets. With Iran controlling the northern coastline of the Strait, any geopolitical tension involving this country immediately raises concerns about potential disruptions to this vital energy corridor.

Key Statistics on Strait of Hormuz Traffic

Qatar alone ships approximately 77 million metric tons of LNG annually through the Strait, accounting for nearly 20% of global LNG market share. This concentration of energy resources passing through a single geographic bottleneck creates a uniquely vulnerable point in global energy supply chains.

What Recent Events Have Threatened the Strait's Security?

Recent escalations between the United States and Iran have brought renewed attention to the vulnerability of the Strait of Hormuz. On June 21, 2025, the United States launched coordinated airstrikes using B-2 stealth bombers and submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles against Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.

Within hours of the attack, the Iranian Parliament reportedly voted to close the Strait—a move that would represent a significant escalation in regional tensions. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio responded with a stark warning: "If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours."

This is not the first time Iran has threatened to close the Strait. Similar threats occurred during periods of heightened tensions in 2011-2012 and again in 2019, typically in response to sanctions and military pressure. However, the current situation appears more volatile given the direct military action against Iranian nuclear infrastructure.

The U.S. administration has consistently maintained that closing the Strait would constitute "economic suicide" for Iran and would likely trigger a multinational response. Despite this, the Iranian government may view such a move as leverage in negotiations or as a means to rally domestic support during a period of intense pressure.

How Would Oil Markets React to a Closure?

Immediate Price Impacts

The immediate effect of a closure of the Strait of Hormuz would be a dramatic spike in global oil prices. Analysts project that Brent crude prices could surge beyond $90 per barrel within days, potentially reaching $110 or higher if the closure persists.

This price shock would occur despite several mitigating factors that exist today but were absent during previous Gulf crises:

1. Increased U.S. oil production capabilities
2. Larger strategic petroleum reserves globally
3. More diversified global energy supply chains
4. Alternative pipeline routes that bypass the Strait

Supply Chain Disruptions

Beyond the immediate price effects, a closure would trigger cascading disruptions throughout global energy supply chains:

• Rerouting challenges: Tankers would need to find alternative routes, increasing transit times and costs
• Insurance premiums: Maritime insurers may suspend coverage entirely or demand prohibitively high war-risk premiums for vessels operating in the region
• Storage limitations: Storage facilities would quickly reach capacity as shipments are delayed
• Refinery adjustments: Refineries calibrated for specific crude grades from the Gulf would face operational challenges

Strategic petroleum and gas reserves would likely be tapped immediately to offset supply disruptions, but these reserves are finite and primarily designed for temporary relief rather than long-term supply replacement.

What Would Happen to Global LNG Markets?

While oil often dominates discussions about the Strait of Hormuz, the impact on liquefied natural gas markets could be equally severe. Qatar, one of the world's largest LNG exporters with approximately 20% of global market share, ships nearly all its production through the Strait.

Unlike oil, which benefits from strategic reserves and relatively flexible transportation options, LNG faces unique vulnerabilities:

• Infrastructure rigidity: LNG requires specialized terminals for loading and unloading
• Limited storage capacity: Global LNG storage capacity is significantly smaller than oil storage
• Seasonal demand patterns: A disruption during winter months would have amplified effects in heating-dependent regions
• Long-term contracts: Many LNG shipments operate under rigid long-term contracts with limited flexibility

For countries that rely heavily on imported natural gas, the consequences would be renewed inflation, worsening energy insecurity, and even the possibility of fuel rationing as winter approaches. Natural gas trends would show immediate volatility, with spot prices—particularly in Asia and Europe—potentially returning to levels not seen since the energy crisis of 2022.

Asian economies including Japan, South Korea, and India would be particularly vulnerable to LNG supply disruptions, potentially facing energy shortages and dramatic price increases for alternative supplies. The LNG import tax structures in countries like India would be severely tested as governments scramble to secure alternative supplies.

How Would Different Countries Be Affected?

Major Importers

Countries heavily dependent on Persian Gulf energy would face varying degrees of vulnerability:

• China: As the world's largest oil importer, China sources approximately 40% of its crude imports from the Gulf region. While it maintains substantial strategic reserves, a prolonged disruption would create significant economic pressure, especially in the context of the ongoing US‑China trade war.

• Japan and South Korea: These nations have limited domestic energy resources and rely heavily on Gulf oil and LNG. Both would be among the first to draw from their strategic stockpiles, but these reserves are limited.

• India: With rapidly growing energy needs and limited strategic reserves, India would face immediate economic challenges from a Strait closure, potentially requiring emergency measures to maintain essential services.

• European Union: While less dependent on Gulf oil than Asian economies, European nations would still face price shocks and potential supply disruptions, particularly for natural gas.

Oil Producers Outside the Gulf

Energy producers outside the affected region would experience complex economic effects:

• United States: As both a major producer and consumer, the U.S. would benefit from higher prices for domestic production while facing economic headwinds from increased energy costs.

• Russia: As a major oil and gas exporter, Russia could benefit financially from higher global energy prices and potentially gain market share in regions seeking alternatives to Gulf supplies.

• Brazil, Norway, and Canada: These producers would likely see windfall profits from higher oil prices while gaining opportunity to secure longer-term supply contracts with importers seeking diversification.

Emerging economies without significant financial reserves to subsidize rising energy costs would be hit hardest by the ripple effects of a Strait closure.

What Economic Ripple Effects Would Occur?

Inflation and Central Bank Responses

A sustained closure of the Strait would trigger inflationary pressures globally, complicating monetary policy for central banks. Transportation costs, manufacturing inputs, and consumer goods would all face upward price pressure, potentially derailing recent progress in controlling inflation.

Central banks would face difficult decisions between:

• Raising interest rates to combat inflation
• Maintaining accommodative policies to prevent economic contraction
• Implementing targeted measures to mitigate energy price impacts

Shipping and Insurance Markets

Maritime shipping and insurance markets would experience immediate disruption:

• War risk premiums for vessels in the region would increase dramatically
• Global shipping capacity would tighten as vessels are rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope
• Container shipping rates would rise as capacity is diverted to energy transport
• Maritime security services would see surging demand

During the 1980s Tanker War, insurance premiums increased by up to 300%, providing a historical precedent for the scale of potential market disruption.

Financial Markets

Financial markets would react swiftly to a closure announcement:

• Energy company stocks would likely see significant volatility
• Airlines, shipping companies, and energy-intensive industries would face negative pressure
• Defense contractors and security firms might experience stock price increases
• Currency markets would reflect changing trade balances and economic outlooks

Could Alternative Routes Replace the Strait?

While some alternative transportation routes exist, none can fully replace the capacity and efficiency of the Strait of Hormuz in the short term:

Pipeline Alternatives

Several pipelines were designed specifically to bypass the Strait:

• East-West Pipeline (Saudi Arabia): Can transport approximately 5 million barrels per day across Saudi Arabia to Red Sea terminals
• Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline: Provides capacity to bypass the Strait for up to 1.5 million barrels per day of UAE production
• Iraqi Pipeline across Saudi Arabia: Currently inactive but could potentially be rehabilitated

However, these pipelines collectively account for less than half of the oil volume that typically transits the Strait (about 6.5 million bpd vs. 21 million bpd), and they offer no alternative for LNG shipments.

Maritime Alternatives

The primary maritime alternative would involve circumnavigating the Arabian Peninsula:

• Adds approximately 2,700 nautical miles to voyages
• Increases transit times by 10-15 days
• Raises shipping costs by 30-40%
• Requires significantly more tankers to maintain the same delivery schedule

These additional costs and delays would inevitably be passed on to consumers and industries worldwide, contributing to oil price stagnation in some markets while causing spikes in others.

How Would Energy Security Policies Change?

A Strait of Hormuz closure would likely accelerate several energy security trends already underway:

Strategic Reserve Expansion

Countries would likely increase investments in strategic petroleum and gas reserves:

• Expanding storage capacity
• Diversifying storage locations
• Creating more flexible release mechanisms
• Establishing stronger international coordination protocols

Supply Diversification

Energy importers would accelerate efforts to diversify their supply sources:

• Developing stronger relationships with producers outside the Middle East
• Investing in domestic production where feasible
• Accelerating renewable energy transitions
• Reconsidering nuclear power in energy-vulnerable countries

Policymakers would move quickly to fast-track LNG terminals, expand storage capacity, and increase imports from more stable suppliers like the United States.

Infrastructure Development

Long-term infrastructure investments would likely increase:

• Additional pipeline capacity to bypass vulnerable maritime routes
• Expanded LNG import terminals in strategic locations
• Enhanced storage facilities for both oil and gas
• More robust emergency distribution systems

Such a crisis would accelerate the global energy realignment already underway and strengthen the case for more long-term investments in nuclear power and renewables as components of energy security strategy. Furthermore, countries would need to address energy export challenges through diversification of markets and transportation routes.

Has the Strait Ever Been Closed Before?

Despite numerous threats and periods of intense conflict, the Strait of Hormuz has never been completely closed to maritime traffic in modern history. The closest historical parallel occurred during the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), particularly during the "Tanker War" phase when both countries attacked commercial shipping.

During this period:

• Over 500 commercial vessels were attacked
• Insurance premiums increased by up to 300%
• International naval forces established protective convoys
• Oil prices experienced significant volatility

However, even during this intense conflict, traffic through the Strait continued, albeit at higher cost and risk. This historical precedent suggests that while disruption is possible, complete closure for an extended period would be difficult to maintain against international pressure.

What Military Responses Might a Closure Trigger?

A closure attempt would almost certainly prompt a coordinated international military response:

U.S. Naval Presence

The United States maintains significant naval assets in the region specifically to ensure freedom of navigation through the Strait:

• The U.S. Fifth Fleet headquartered in Bahrain
• Carrier strike groups that can be rapidly deployed
• Advanced mine countermeasure capabilities
• Air assets capable of neutralizing coastal threats

The recent airstrikes demonstrated U.S. capability to project power in the region, using B-2 stealth bombers and submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles.

Multinational Operations

Unlike previous Gulf conflicts, a Strait closure would affect virtually all major economies, potentially leading to unprecedented international cooperation:

• NATO maritime security operations
• Coordination with Asian naval powers including Japan and India
• Possible involvement of Chinese naval assets to protect their energy interests
• Unified maritime security corridors and convoy systems

The U.S. has urged China to dissuade Iran from closing the Strait, recognizing that such an act would be seen as hostile—and not just by Washington. Many of the world's major economies have a vested interest in keeping the Strait open, and a multinational response is more than likely.

What Are the Practical Challenges of Closing the Strait?

While Iran has threatened to close the Strait, actually implementing and maintaining such a closure would present significant challenges:

Military Requirements

Effectively closing the Strait would require:

• Extensive mining operations
• Anti-ship missile deployments
• Small boat swarm tactics
• Sustained air defense capabilities

All of these would need to be maintained while under intense military pressure from opposing forces with superior capabilities.

Economic Self-Harm

Iran itself relies heavily on the Strait for its own exports and imports. A closure would:

• Severely restrict Iran's oil export revenues
• Limit import of essential goods
• Accelerate economic isolation
• Potentially erode domestic political support

Closing the Strait would damage Iran's own economy, which relies heavily on maritime exports.

Diplomatic Isolation

Closing an international waterway would:

• Violate international maritime law
• Alienate neutral countries and potential allies
• Provide legal justification for military intervention
• Undermine diplomatic leverage in other negotiations

How Would Global Energy Transitions Be Affected?

A major disruption to fossil fuel supplies could accelerate energy transition efforts while simultaneously creating new challenges:

Renewable Energy Investment

Higher fossil fuel prices would improve the comparative economics of renewable energy:

• Solar and wind projects would see enhanced financial returns
• Investment capital might flow more rapidly to clean energy
• Energy security concerns would align more closely with decarbonization goals

Electric Vehicle Adoption

Transportation electrification could accelerate:

• Consumer demand for electric vehicles would likely increase
• Government incentives might expand to reduce oil dependency
• Charging infrastructure investments could be prioritized

Fossil Fuel Infrastructure

Paradoxically, energy security concerns might also drive:

• Increased investment in domestic fossil fuel production
• Expansion of strategic reserves and storage infrastructure
• Development of alternative supply routes and sources

The crisis would strengthen the case for long-term investments in nuclear power and renewables while simultaneously driving short-term investments in fossil fuel infrastructure.

What Lessons Can Be Learned from Previous Threats?

Iran has threatened to close the Strait numerous times without following through. These past episodes offer important insights:

Threat as Leverage

Iran typically uses the threat of closure as diplomatic leverage rather than as an immediate military objective. Previous threats have often coincided with:

• International sanctions pressure
• Nuclear program negotiations
• Regional security discussions

In 2011-2012 and again in 2019, Iran issued similar threats in response to sanctions and military pressure. In each case, the threat alone was enough to shake global energy markets, even without an actual blockade.

International Response Patterns

Historical responses to Strait of Hormuz threats have established predictable patterns:

• Immediate diplomatic condemnation
• Increased naval deployments to the region
• Coordination among major importing nations
• Preparations for emergency energy measures

Market Adaptation

Energy markets have developed mechanisms to price and manage Strait of Hormuz risk:

• Risk premiums built into futures contracts
• Diversification strategies by major importers
• Strategic reserve coordination among IEA members
• Alternative supply arrangements

FAQ: Critical Questions About a Potential Closure

How quickly would oil prices rise if the Strait closed?

Oil prices would likely surge within hours of a confirmed closure, potentially increasing 20-30% in the first trading session. The magnitude would depend on perceived duration, available alternatives, and strategic reserve deployment plans.

Could the world's strategic petroleum reserves compensate for a closure?

Collectively, global strategic petroleum reserves could offset a complete Strait of Hormuz closure for approximately 90-120 days at full release rates.

Worried About Missing The Next Big Resource Discovery?

Don't let game-changing ASX mining announcements slip through your fingers – Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model provides instant, actionable insights on significant mineral discoveries as soon as they happen. Explore our dedicated discoveries page to see how historic mineral finds have generated exceptional returns, and position yourself ahead of the market with our 30-day free trial.