Chile’s Landmark Codelco-SQM Lithium Deal Faces Critical Hurdles

What is the Codelco-SQM Lithium Deal and Why Does It Matter?

The landmark partnership between Chile's state mining company Codelco and private lithium producer SQM represents one of the most significant reshapings of the global lithium industry in decades. This strategic agreement will transfer majority control of SQM's valuable Atacama salt flat operations to Codelco while extending SQM's operational rights by 30 years beyond their current contract.

The deal serves as the centerpiece of President Gabriel Boric's national lithium strategy, which aims to increase state involvement in critical minerals while simultaneously expanding production capacity. With a targeted completion date of September 2025 (before Chile's next government transition), both parties are racing against political and regulatory clocks.

"This partnership fundamentally rebalances Chile's approach to its lithium wealth, seeking to capture more value for the state while maintaining the operational expertise of private industry," notes mining policy analyst Carmen Vega.

Despite lithium prices languishing at four-year lows amid global oversupply, the strategic importance of the Codelco and SQM lithium deal transcends current market conditions. Chile possesses approximately 39% of the world's lithium reserves, with the Atacama salt flat representing one of the highest-quality, lowest-cost production sites globally.

Understanding Chile's Strategic Lithium Partnership

The Codelco-SQM agreement represents a hybrid model between full nationalization and pure private enterprise. SQM relinquishes majority ownership of its Atacama assets to Codelco but maintains operational control for three additional decades. This structure aims to balance national resource sovereignty with the efficiency and technical expertise of the private sector.

Key elements of the deal include:

• Ownership restructuring: Codelco gains majority control of Atacama assets
• Operational continuity: SQM maintains production authority for 30 years
• Production expansion: Despite current market oversupply, plans to increase output
• Technology sharing: Knowledge transfer provisions between both entities
• Revenue distribution: New royalty and profit-sharing mechanisms

The partnership aims to strengthen Chile's competitive position amid challenging market conditions through cost leadership. The Atacama operations boast production costs estimated at $2,500-3,000 per tonne—significantly below the global average of $5,000-7,000 per tonne for hard-rock mining operations.

Chile's Position in the Global Lithium Market

Chile currently produces approximately 26% of global lithium supply, second only to Australia. However, Chile's brine-based extraction offers significant advantages over Australia's spodumene (hard rock) mining:

The Atacama salt flat's exceptional lithium concentration (1,000-1,500 mg/L) and high evaporation rates create natural competitive advantages that the Codelco-SQM partnership intends to leverage despite the current oversupplied market.

"We're betting on low costs to keep expanding despite prices of the battery metal languishing around four-year lows," a Codelco official stated, highlighting the long-term vision behind the deal.

What Approvals Does the Deal Still Need?

Despite political momentum, the Codelco-SQM agreement faces several critical hurdles before final implementation. Codelco has emphasized its commitment to completing all pending approvals by the end of September 2025, an ambitious timeline given the complex stakeholder landscape.

Remaining Regulatory Hurdles

Three major approvals remain outstanding:

1. Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission (CCHEN) authorization: As lithium was historically classified as a strategic material with nuclear applications, CCHEN maintains regulatory oversight of lithium extraction licenses. Their technical evaluation assesses environmental impacts, production quotas, and national security considerations.

2. Community consultation processes: Under ILO Convention 169 (which Chile ratified in 2008), indigenous communities affected by mining projects must be consulted. The Atacama region is home to several indigenous groups with territorial claims, including the Atacameño, Colla, and Diaguita peoples, who have expressed concerns about water usage and environmental impacts.

3. Chinese antitrust approval: With Tianqi Lithium holding approximately 23% of SQM's shares, Chinese regulatory authorities must approve the restructuring under their merger control regulations. This adds an international dimension to an already complex approval process.

Codelco's tight timeline aims to finalize these approvals before Chile's presidential transition in early 2026, creating significant regulatory pressure.

Legal Challenges and Opposition

Beyond regulatory hurdles, the deal faces direct legal opposition. Tianqi Lithium, SQM's second-largest shareholder, has initiated court proceedings against the agreement, arguing it "lacks transparency and should go to a shareholder vote." This legal challenge could potentially delay or derail the partnership if Chilean courts rule in Tianqi's favor.

The litigation centers on corporate governance questions, including:

• Whether the restructuring constitutes a fundamental change requiring shareholder approval
• If minority shareholder rights are adequately protected
• Whether proper disclosure procedures were followed during negotiations

Resolution of these legal disputes is expected by late 2025, though appeals could extend the timeline further, potentially impacting the deal's implementation schedule.

Why is the Deal Facing Political Opposition?

The Codelco-SQM agreement has become a lightning rod in Chile's ongoing debate about resource nationalism, private investment, and the country's mining heritage. Political opposition stems from both ideological and procedural concerns.

Criticism from Presidential Candidates

Presidential candidate Jeannette Jara, who won the left-wing primary on June 29, 2025, has taken a nuanced position on the deal. She has pledged to respect the agreement if finalized during the current administration but would "seek alternatives if the deal is still pending" when she potentially takes office. This conditional support creates political uncertainty for the partnership.

Other presidential candidates have voiced stronger criticism, particularly regarding the "lack of a public bidding process." They argue that:

• Direct negotiation with SQM lacked competitive pricing tension
• Other potential partners were excluded without evaluation
• Alternative models (full nationalization or open concession) weren't adequately considered
• The process lacked sufficient transparency and public input

The opposition culminated in a symbolic rejection by an investigative commission in Chile's lower house in May 2025, highlighting the polarized political environment surrounding the deal.

Historical Context and Ownership Sensitivities

The controversy is deepened by SQM's historical connections. The company's largest shareholder remains the family of Julio Ponce, former son-in-law of dictator Augusto Pinochet. During the Pinochet regime (1973-1990), many of Chile's natural resources were privatized under contentious circumstances.

This historical association triggers deep-seated concerns about:

• Legacy of privatization: Many Chileans view the original SQM concessions as improperly granted during the dictatorship
• Wealth distribution: Questions about whether sufficient economic benefits flow to the Chilean people
• Symbolic significance: The perception that the deal legitimizes arrangements from an undemocratic era

"Chile's lithium debate isn't just about economics—it's about reconciling with our past while securing our future," explains political historian Rafael Moreno. "The Pinochet legacy still shapes public perception of private mining interests."

These historical sensitivities explain why the government has structured the deal to increase state control while maintaining operational continuity—attempting to balance competing political narratives about resource sovereignty.

How Will the Deal Transform Chile's Lithium Industry?

The Codelco-SQM partnership represents a fundamental restructuring of Chile's lithium sector, establishing a new paradigm for public-private collaboration in strategic mineral development.

Ownership and Control Structure Changes

Under the agreement, SQM relinquishes majority ownership of its Atacama operations to Codelco, Chile's state copper mining company. This represents a significant shift from the current model where private interests maintain both ownership and operational control. The new structure creates:

• Majority state ownership: Codelco becomes the controlling partner in Atacama assets
• Operational continuity: SQM maintains production authority for 30 additional years
• Joint governance: New oversight mechanisms with representation from both entities
• Technology sharing: Provisions for knowledge transfer between partners
• Strategic alignment: Coordinated approach to expansion and investment decisions

This hybrid model aims to capture more economic value for the Chilean state while preserving the technical expertise and operational efficiency of private enterprise. The extended 30-year timeline provides SQM with long-term certainty while giving Codelco decades to develop its own lithium expertise.

Economic and Production Implications

Despite current lithium market oversupply and depressed prices, the partnership maintains ambitious expansion plans. This counter-cyclical approach relies on the Atacama's exceptional cost position to remain profitable even in challenging market conditions.

The economic strategy includes:

1. Cost leadership: Leveraging Atacama's natural advantages (high concentration, solar evaporation) to maintain industry-leading cost structure
2. Production scaling: Increasing output despite current oversupply, positioning for long-term market recovery
3. Value-added processing: Exploring opportunities to move beyond commodity lithium carbonate to higher-value products
4. Vertical integration: Potential development of domestic battery material production capacity

The partnership's financial structure will significantly increase Chile's share of lithium revenues through a combination of:

• Enhanced royalty rates
• Direct profit participation through Codelco's ownership stake
• Tax revenues from expanded production
• Potential downstream development

While specific revenue projections remain confidential, analysts estimate the deal could increase Chile's capture of lithium value by 15-25% compared to the previous arrangement, representing billions in additional national income over the contract's 30-year lifespan.

What Are the Global Implications?

The Codelco-SQM partnership arrives at a pivotal moment for the global lithium industry, with significant potential to reshape market dynamics, supply chains, and resource governance models worldwide.

Impact on International Lithium Markets

Chile's decision to expand production despite lithium prices hovering at four-year lows could have profound market implications:

• Extended oversupply: Increased Chilean output may prolong the current market imbalance
• Competitive pressure: Lower-cost Chilean production could force higher-cost producers to curtail operations
• Price stabilization: Medium-term price floor supported by production discipline among higher-cost producers
• Investment hesitancy: Potential chilling effect on new lithium project development globally

The partnership's cost advantage positions it to weather market downturns that might prove fatal to higher-cost operations, potentially accelerating industry consolidation. Chile's Atacama operations can remain profitable at price points where Australian spodumene miners and Chinese converters struggle to break even.

Battery manufacturers and electric vehicle producers may benefit from continued lithium price moderation, supporting the broader electrification transition.

Strategic Minerals Policy Trends

The Codelco-SQM model represents an innovative approach to strategic resource governance that other mineral-rich nations are watching closely. It offers a middle path between:

• Full nationalization (as seen in Bolivia's lithium industry)
• Pure private enterprise (as practiced in Australia)
• Traditional concession models (common in many mining jurisdictions)

This hybrid approach may inspire similar structures in other nations seeking to increase state participation without sacrificing operational efficiency or deterring private investment.

The deal also highlights growing global recognition of lithium as a critical minerals energy transition resource rather than a conventional commodity. As countries position for energy transition advantage, control of battery mineral supply chains has become a matter of national security and economic strategy.

"Chile's approach represents a sophisticated evolution in resource nationalism," notes mining economist Luis Fernández. "Rather than binary choices between state and private control, we're seeing the emergence of partnership models that blend the strengths of both."

Other lithium-producing nations like Argentina, Australia, and Canada will likely evaluate the Chilean model's success as they refine their own strategic minerals policies. Furthermore, Argentinian lithium insights suggest that neighboring countries are closely monitoring this deal for potential implications on their own resource governance approaches.

What Happens if the Deal Falls Through?

Given the complex approval process and mounting opposition, the possibility of the Codelco-SQM deal collapsing remains significant. Understanding potential alternative scenarios is crucial for stakeholders across the lithium value chain.

Alternative Scenarios

If the current agreement fails to secure necessary approvals or is derailed by legal challenges, several alternative pathways could emerge:

1. Renegotiated partnership: A modified agreement with different ownership percentages, governance structures, or economic terms
2. Competitive tender: A public bidding process for the Atacama assets as demanded by opposition candidates
3. Full nationalization: Complete state takeover of lithium operations, especially if left-wing candidates gain power
4. Status quo extension: Temporary continuation of SQM's current operational rights while a new framework is developed
5. Fragmented approach: Division of the Atacama resource among multiple operators to increase competition

Presidential candidate Jeannette Jara has explicitly stated she would "seek alternatives" if the deal remains pending when she potentially takes office, suggesting a significant policy pivot should the agreement not be finalized before the government transition.

Market and Investment Consequences

Failure of the deal would create substantial uncertainty in lithium markets and Chile's broader investment environment:

• Investment hesitancy: Delayed capital commitments for Chilean lithium expansion
• Production implications: Potential interruptions in expansion planning, affecting medium-term supply forecasts
• Competitive positioning: Opportunity for other producing regions to gain market share during Chilean uncertainty
• Valuation impacts: Significant effects on SQM's market capitalization and investor confidence
• Policy premium: Increased risk premium for all Chilean mining investments amid regulatory uncertainty

Global lithium market trends would face recalibration as buyers assess the reliability of Chilean supply and potentially diversify sourcing to mitigate political risk.

FAQ About the Codelco-SQM Lithium Deal

What exactly is Codelco getting from this deal?

Codelco is acquiring majority ownership of SQM's Atacama salt flat operations, Chile's most valuable lithium asset. This provides the state with:

• Direct equity participation in Chile's most profitable lithium resource
• Governance authority over strategic decisions regarding resource development
• Enhanced revenue streams through both dividends and royalties
• Knowledge transfer from SQM's decades of operational expertise
• Strategic control of a critical resource for the energy transition
• Long-term optionality for downstream development

While specific financial terms remain confidential, industry analysts estimate the deal values the Atacama assets at $15-18 billion, making this one of the largest strategic mineral transactions globally.

How might this deal affect lithium prices?

The partnership's expansion plans despite current market oversupply could exert continued downward pressure on lithium prices. Several factors will influence price dynamics:

• Timing of expansion: Production increases phased over 5-7 years
• Demand growth: Accelerating electric vehicle adoption may absorb new supply
• Cost competitiveness: Atacama's low-cost position allows profitable operation even at depressed prices
• Market rationalization: Higher-cost producers may suspend operations, balancing the market
• Product specification: Increasing battery manufacturer quality requirements may segment the market

The deal's long-term horizon (30 years) suggests both parties are looking beyond current price cycles to position for decades of anticipated demand growth.

What are the environmental considerations?

The Atacama salt flat presents unique environmental challenges that the partnership must address:

• Water usage: The arid Atacama region faces severe water scarcity, with lithium operations consuming significant groundwater resources
• Indigenous concerns: Local communities have raised concerns about impacts on fragile desert ecosystems
• Salinity balance: Brine extraction affects the salt flat's hydrological equilibrium
• Protected species: The region hosts unique fauna, including Andean flamingos, that depend on specialized habitats
• Energy transition: Despite local impacts, lithium production supports global decarbonization efforts

The agreement reportedly includes enhanced environmental provisions, including water usage limitations, habitat preservation commitments, and progressive reclamation requirements, though specific details remain confidential pending regulatory review.

How does this deal reflect broader resource nationalism trends?

Chile's approach represents a nuanced evolution of resource nationalism that balances multiple objectives:

• Increased state participation without full expropriation
• Operational continuity through private sector expertise
• Technology transfer via partnership structures
• Investment protection through extended contract terms
• Enhanced economic returns for the public treasury

This model differs significantly from traditional resource nationalism seen in countries like Bolivia (full state control) or Mexico (restrictive permitting), offering a potential "third way" that other nations may emulate.

The approach acknowledges both the strategic importance of critical minerals and the

Ready to Stay Ahead of the Next Major Mineral Discovery?

Gain immediate alerts on significant ASX mineral discoveries through Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model, which transforms complex mining data into actionable investment insights. Explore historic discoveries and their exceptional returns by visiting the dedicated discoveries page and position yourself ahead of the market.