Why Investors Keep Buying BHP and Fortescue Despite Price Falls

Understanding Investor Behavior in Resource Stocks

In the complex world of resource stock investing, peculiar patterns often emerge during market downturns. Recent trading data reveals that investors maintained strong buying interest in major mining stocks like BHP and Fortescue despite significant price declines. This counter-intuitive behavior offers fascinating insights into why did investors keep buying BHP and Fortescue shares amid price falls and reveals sophisticated investment strategies in the resources sector.

What Drives Buying When Share Prices Fall?

Resource stocks inherently experience significant price volatility tied to commodity cycles. When share prices decline, certain investor behaviors become more pronounced, revealing sophisticated strategies rather than simple market reactions.

Dollar-cost averaging represents a foundational approach for many resource investors. This strategy involves systematically purchasing shares at regular intervals regardless of price, effectively lowering the average purchase cost during downturns. For resource stocks with long-term value propositions, this approach helps investors build positions while reducing the impact of market volatility.

"The resource sector's cyclical nature creates natural dollar-cost averaging opportunities that patient investors can leverage to build substantial positions at favorable average prices," notes mining analyst Sarah Chen at Macquarie Securities.

Long-term outlook prioritization drives many investors to look beyond immediate price movements. Resource companies with quality assets often maintain their intrinsic value despite short-term market pessimism. Investors with multi-year horizons focus on fundamental factors like resource quality, production costs, and operational efficiency rather than quarterly price fluctuations.

Dividend yield enhancement creates a compelling case for buying during price declines. As share prices fall while dividend amounts remain stable, the effective yield increases significantly. This is particularly relevant for established miners like BHP, which maintained its dividend commitment even during challenging market conditions.

For example, when BHP's share price declined 13.9% in FY25, its dividend yield rose from approximately 5.2% to 6.0%, creating an attractive income opportunity for yield-focused investors.

Contrarian investment philosophy represents another key driver, with investors deliberately moving against market sentiment. This approach assumes that markets frequently overreact to negative news, creating contrarian mining success opportunities when pessimism reaches extreme levels.

Sector rotation strategies also influence buying patterns, as institutional investors systematically increase resource exposure when valuations appear attractive relative to other sectors. This rotation often occurs when economic indicators suggest potential commodity demand increases on the horizon.

How Trading Patterns Revealed Investor Confidence

Recent trading data from online investment platform Stake provided remarkable insights into investor behavior during FY25's resource sector volatility:

• BHP and Fortescue emerged as the two most actively traded ASX stocks
• Both companies maintained identical 63% buy to 37% sell ratios
• These represented the highest buy ratios among the top 10 most traded ASX 200 shares
• The continued buying occurred despite BHP shares falling 13.9% and Fortescue dropping a substantial 28.6%

This data reveals a striking disconnect between price performance and investor sentiment, suggesting strong underlying confidence in these companies despite market concerns.

Why BHP Shares Attracted Buyers Despite Price Declines

BHP's continued buying support during price weakness reflects several strategic advantages that appealed to investors looking beyond short-term volatility.

The Copper-Iron Ore Balance

BHP's diversified portfolio created a natural hedging effect that resonated with investors concerned about single-commodity exposure:

• Rising copper prices partially offset weaker iron ore performance, with copper price insights showing futures gaining 11.3% while iron ore fell 18.7% during the period
• Copper now represents 39% of BHP's EBITDA, reducing single-commodity risk
• Strategic acquisitions of OZ Minerals and Filo Corp strengthened copper exposure
• Iron ore prices around US$100/tonne still generated solid cash flows despite concerns

BHP's deliberate portfolio rebalancing strategy positioned the company to benefit from divergent commodity price movements. While iron ore faced headwinds from Chinese property market concerns, copper gained from supply constraints and growing demand from electrification and AI infrastructure.

"BHP's portfolio transition toward future-facing commodities, particularly copper, has created a more resilient earnings profile that appeals to investors seeking reduced commodity-specific risk," explains mining sector strategist Michael Zhang.

Strategic Positioning for Future Demand

Investors recognized BHP's strategic alignment with major global trends that transcend short-term market volatility:

• Increased copper exposure positions BHP to benefit from the AI infrastructure rollout, with each data center requiring approximately 10-15 metric tons of copper
• Global electrification trends support long-term copper demand growth, with electric vehicles requiring 2.5-4 times more copper than conventional vehicles
• Diversification strategy reduces vulnerability to Chinese housing market weakness
• Resource portfolio matches critical materials needed for energy transition

The company's focus on operational excellence further bolstered investor confidence. BHP maintained its position in the lowest quartile of the global cost curve for both iron ore and copper production, ensuring profitability even during price downturns.

BHP's balance sheet strength also attracted investors during uncertainty. With net debt of US$8.5 billion against a market capitalization exceeding US$160 billion, the company maintained substantial financial flexibility for both dividend payments and strategic acquisitions.

Why Fortescue Shares Maintained Buying Interest

Despite greater commodity concentration risk than BHP, Fortescue maintained strong buying interest during significant price declines, demonstrating the complex decision-making process investors apply to resource stocks.

Pure-Play Iron Ore Exposure

Despite being more vulnerable to iron ore market trends, Fortescue maintained strong buying interest:

• Complete revenue dependence on iron ore sales to China
• Iron ore prices fell below US$100/tonne during the period
• Lower-quality ore commanded price discounts compared to Pilbara competitors
• Share price dropped 28.6% over FY25

This vulnerability appeared to create opportunity rather than deterrence for many investors, particularly those with a contrarian approach. With the market already pricing in significant risks, Fortescue's valuation metrics became increasingly attractive.

The company traded at a forward P/E ratio of 8.7x during its price low, compared to its 5-year average of 11.3x, creating what many value investors considered a margin of safety.

Fortescue's cost leadership also supported buying interest. Despite producing lower-grade iron ore that attracts price discounts, the company maintained C1 costs around US$16.30 per wet metric tonne, among the lowest globally. This cost advantage created profitability even during price weakness.

Clean Energy Transition Challenges

Fortescue's green energy ambitions faced headwinds but remained part of the investment thesis:

• Cost-cutting measures implemented across operations reduced operating expenses by 12%
• Workforce reductions occurred as part of operational restructuring
• Clean energy division faced investment scrutiny amid market conditions
• Recent iron ore price forecast supported share recovery in later weeks

The company's Fortescue Future Industries (FFI) division, focused on green hydrogen and renewable energy, represented both risk and opportunity. While requiring substantial capital investment during challenging market conditions, it offered diversification potential beyond traditional mining operations.

"Fortescue's dual focus on operational excellence in iron ore while building future growth through clean energy initiatives presents a compelling long-term investment case despite near-term headwinds," notes resources analyst James Wilson at Euroz Hartleys.

Fortescue's dividend yield reached 9.7% during its price low, creating substantial income appeal for investors willing to accept the commodity concentration risk. This yield premium compared to market averages attracted income-focused investors despite price volatility.

Contrasting Case: Lithium Stocks Face Selling Pressure

Unlike iron ore majors, lithium producers experienced significantly different investor behavior, highlighting how market participants differentiate between resource subsectors based on supply-demand dynamics.

Pilbara Minerals' Different Trading Pattern

The lithium sector presented a stark contrast to the iron ore majors:

• Highest sell ratio (57%) among the top 10 most traded stocks
• Fifth most actively traded stock overall
• Share price declined 56% during FY25
• Spodumene concentrate prices fell below US$1,000/tonne amid Chinese oversupply

This selling pressure reflected fundamental challenges in the lithium market rather than simple risk aversion. While long-term electric vehicle adoption trends remained intact, near-term oversupply concerns dominated market sentiment.

The lithium price collapse had direct operational implications. Industry-wide production costs averaged approximately US$900-1,100 per tonne, meaning many producers operated near breakeven or at a loss as prices approached US$1,000/tonne.

Long-Term Confidence Versus Short-Term Concerns

Despite selling pressure, Pilbara Minerals maintained some investment appeal:

• Management expressed confidence in long-term EV and battery demand growth
• Operational optimization efforts continued despite price environment
• Latin Resources acquisition provided future Brazilian supply diversification
• $1+ billion cash position offered financial buffer during price weakness

The contrasting investor behavior between iron ore and lithium stocks highlights the nuanced assessment process investors apply to different resource subsectors. While both experienced price declines, the underlying supply-demand dynamics and industry positions within their respective cycles differed significantly.

Why Investors Apply Different Strategies to Different Mining Stocks

The varied investor responses to price declines across mining subsectors reveal sophisticated decision-making processes based on multiple factors beyond simple price movements.

Risk Assessment Factors

Investors evaluate mining stocks using several key metrics that influence buy/sell decisions:

• Balance sheet strength – cash reserves, debt levels, and financial flexibility
• Production costs – position on global cost curve and margin resilience
• Resource quality – grade, impurities, and market premiums/discounts
• Operational diversity – geographic and commodity diversification
• Management track record – capital allocation and operational execution history

These factors combine to create a risk profile that varies significantly between companies even within the same commodity subsector. For example, BHP's diversified portfolio and balance sheet strength created a lower risk profile than pure-play producers despite exposure to similar commodities.

Resource quality represents a particularly important consideration often overlooked by casual observers. For iron ore producers, grade differentials can create substantial pricing variations:

These quality differentials directly impact realized prices and operating margins, creating varying risk profiles even among producers of the same commodity.

Market Timing Versus Long-Term Accumulation

Different investment approaches emerge during price weakness:

• Value investors identify opportunities when prices fall below intrinsic value
• Income seekers target higher dividend yields when prices decline
• Momentum traders may sell during downtrends to avoid further losses
• Long-term accumulators view price weakness as entry opportunity

The preponderance of buying activity in BHP and Fortescue suggests value and income strategies dominated during the period, with investors focusing on fundamental valuation metrics rather than short-term price momentum.

"The key to successful resource investing lies in distinguishing between cyclical price movements and structural market changes," explains veteran mining analyst Peter Thompson. "The former creates buying opportunities while the latter necessitates strategic reassessment."

How Market Conditions Influence Mining Stock Valuations

Understanding the broader economic context helps explain the varying investor responses to price declines across mining subsectors.

Commodity Price Drivers

The underlying commodity markets shape investor behavior through their distinct supply-demand dynamics:

• Iron ore: Primarily influenced by Chinese construction and infrastructure activity, with 70% of seaborne iron ore consumed by Chinese steelmakers
• Copper: Driven by global electrification, renewable energy, and AI infrastructure, with supply constraints from aging mines and declining ore grades
• Lithium: Electric vehicle adoption rates and battery production capacity, with recent oversupply from accelerated production growth

These distinct drivers create different cycle positioning for each commodity. During FY25, iron ore appeared mid-cycle with price stabilization potential, copper showed early-cycle characteristics with supply constraints, while lithium exhibited late-cycle traits with significant oversupply concerns.

Macroeconomic Factors

Broader economic conditions significantly shape mining stock performance:

• Interest rate environments affect capital-intensive mining operations through borrowing costs
• Currency fluctuations impact revenue for Australian exporters, with AUD/USD movements directly affecting profit margins
• Global growth forecasts influence commodity demand expectations
• Inflation concerns can drive investment in hard assets like resources

During FY25, gradually moderating interest rates supported capital-intensive mining operations, while concerns about inflation persistence enhanced the appeal of resource stocks as potential inflation hedges.

Expert Strategies for Mining Stock Investments

Professional investors employ specific approaches when evaluating mining stocks during price declines, focusing on both quantitative metrics and qualitative assessments.

When to Consider Buying During Price Declines

Market analysts suggest several indicators that may signal buying opportunities:

• Share prices trading below replacement cost of assets
• Price-to-earnings ratios below historical averages
• Enterprise value to EBITDA metrics at cyclical lows
• Strong free cash flow generation despite price weakness
• Continued dividend payments signaling management confidence

For example, BHP's EV/EBITDA ratio reached 5.2x during its price low, compared to its 10-year average of 6.8x, suggesting potential undervaluation despite short-term price weakness.

The free cash flow yield provides particularly valuable insights for resource investors. During price declines, this metric helps identify companies maintaining strong cash generation despite challenging market conditions.

This data helps explain why did investors keep buying BHP and Fortescue shares amid price falls, as their free cash flow yields significantly exceeded historical averages, indicating potential value opportunity.

Portfolio Construction Approaches

Diversification strategies can help manage resource sector volatility:

• Balancing pure-play producers with diversified miners to reduce commodity-specific risk
• Including different commodity exposures with varying economic cycles
• Maintaining appropriate sector weighting based on risk tolerance
• Considering ETFs for broader resource exposure with reduced company-specific risk

This balanced approach allows investors to maintain resource sector exposure while managing the inherent volatility characteristic of commodity-linked equities.

Future Outlook for Australian Mining Investments

Looking forward, several key trends will likely shape investor behavior in mining stocks, creating both challenges and opportunities for those considering the sector.

Evolving Commodity Demand Patterns

Long-term trends suggest changing priorities in resource markets:

• Traditional infrastructure materials remain important but face growth limitations from China's economic transition
• Critical minerals for energy transition gaining strategic importance
• Technology-enabling metals experiencing demand acceleration from AI infrastructure
• Resource security concerns driving investment in domestic supply chains

These trends create a bifurcated outlook for the resources sector, with different commodities positioned at various points in their respective demand cycles.

BHP's portfolio transition toward future-facing commodities positions it favorably within this evolving landscape, potentially explaining the strong buying interest despite short-term price weakness.

Investment Implications

For investors considering mining stocks, several factors warrant attention:

• Companies with exposure to both traditional and future-facing commodities offer balanced opportunity
• Operational efficiency becomes increasingly important in mature commodity markets
• ESG performance increasingly influences investment decisions and company valuations
• Geographic diversification helps mitigate country-specific regulatory and political risks

"The most successful resource investors recognize that price volatility creates opportunity rather than risk when the underlying business fundamentals remain intact," observes fund manager Rebecca Williams, who specializes in natural resources investments.

Furthermore, the continued advancement of mining industry innovation is reshaping operational efficiency and sustainability practices, creating additional value drivers beyond commodity price movements.

FAQ: Mining Stock Investment Strategies

Why do investors buy mining stocks when prices are falling?

Investors often view price declines in quality mining stocks as buying opportunities if they believe the underlying fundamentals remain strong. This approach, known as dollar-cost averaging, allows investors to build positions at lower average costs while potentially capturing higher dividend yields. Many resource investors take a contrarian approach, buying when market sentiment is negative but long-term industry fundamentals remain intact.

The cyclical nature of commodity markets creates natural buying opportunities for patient investors with long-term horizons. Historical analysis shows that purchasing quality mining stocks during cyclical downturns has frequently generated superior long-term returns compared to buying during periods of peak optimism.

How can mining companies maintain investor confidence during commodity downturns?

Mining companies build investor confidence during downturns through several strategies: maintaining strong balance sheets with low debt, continuing dividend payments when possible, reducing operating costs to preserve margins, progressing high-

Want to Capitalise on the Next Major Mineral Discovery?

Stay ahead of the market with Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model, which instantly notifies investors of significant ASX mineral discoveries and transforms complex data into actionable insights. Explore why historic discoveries generate substantial returns by visiting Discovery Alert's dedicated discoveries page and begin your 30-day free trial today.