Nearly $1bn in US Funding Proposed for Critical Minerals and Materials

Understanding Critical Minerals and Materials

Critical minerals and materials form the backbone of modern technology and industrial applications, playing crucial roles in everything from renewable energy to national defense. These resources are designated as "critical" when they serve vital economic and security functions while facing potential supply chain vulnerabilities. The United States has recognized the strategic importance of securing domestic access to these materials, leading to a proposed $935 million funding initiative.

Critical minerals include elements that most consumers never see but depend on daily. They power smartphones, enable renewable energy technologies, and support advanced defense systems. Their criticality stems from a combination of their essential applications and the risks associated with their supply chains.

Strategic Materials Powering the Modern World

Critical minerals encompass several distinct categories, each serving unique technological purposes:

• Rare earth elements (REEs): Despite their name, many REEs are relatively abundant in the Earth's crust but rarely found in concentrated, economically viable deposits. These 17 elements—including neodymium, dysprosium, and praseodymium—are essential for creating powerful permanent magnets used in electric vehicle motors, wind turbines, and precision-guided munitions.

• Battery materials: Lithium, cobalt, nickel, and graphite form the foundation of modern energy storage technologies. Lithium-ion batteries power everything from smartphones to electric vehicles, with demand projected to grow 4x by 2030 as transportation electrification accelerates.

• Semiconductor materials: Silicon remains the foundation of most computing chips, but specialized semiconductor materials like gallium, germanium, and silicon carbide enable next-generation electronics with superior performance in high-temperature and high-frequency applications.

• Strategic metals: Materials like tungsten, titanium, and chromium provide unique properties for specialized applications where substitutes are limited or nonexistent. Tungsten, for instance, has the highest melting point of any metal (3,422°C), making it irreplaceable in certain high-temperature applications.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey's most recent assessment, the United States is 100% import-dependent for 14 critical minerals and more than 50% import-dependent for an additional 31 minerals, highlighting the vulnerability of these supply chains.

Why Is the US Investing in Critical Minerals?

The nearly $1 billion funding proposal represents a significant commitment to addressing long-standing vulnerabilities in America's critical mineral supply chains. This investment reflects growing recognition of these materials' strategic importance across multiple dimensions.

National Security Imperatives

Defense applications rely heavily on critical minerals, from rare earth magnets in precision-guided munitions to specialized alloys in aircraft and naval vessels. The Department of Defense has identified supply chain vulnerabilities as a significant risk factor for national security.

Military systems containing critical minerals include:

• Radar and sonar systems
• Laser targeting equipment
• Communications infrastructure
• Night vision technology
• Advanced weapons platforms

Currently, China controls approximately 60% of rare earth mining and 87% of processing capacity globally, creating a strategic vulnerability that the funding initiative aims to address. The reliance on potentially adversarial nations for materials essential to defense technologies presents unacceptable risks to military readiness.

Economic Competitiveness Factors

Beyond security concerns, the critical minerals funding initiative represents an economic strategy to position American companies competitively in high-growth technology sectors. The Department of Energy estimates that the clean energy transition alone could generate $23 trillion in new global market opportunities by 2030.

Developing domestic capabilities across the entire critical minerals value chain—from extraction to processing and manufacturing—creates high-paying jobs while strengthening America's industrial base. A single critical minerals processing facility can create hundreds of direct jobs and thousands of indirect positions throughout the supply chain.

"For too long, the United States has relied on foreign actors to supply and process the critical materials that are essential to modern life and our national security," Energy Secretary Chris Wright stated, emphasizing the economic and security dimensions of the funding initiative.

Energy Transition Support

The clean energy transition security has dramatically increased demand for certain critical minerals. A typical electric vehicle requires six times the mineral inputs of a conventional car, while an onshore wind plant needs nine times more mineral resources than a gas-fired power plant of equivalent capacity.

Key minerals essential for clean energy technologies include:

1. Lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, and graphite for battery performance, longevity, and energy density
2. Rare earth elements for permanent magnets in wind turbines and EV motors
3. Copper and aluminum for electricity networks and wiring
4. Silicon and silver for solar photovoltaic technology

The International Energy Agency projects that mineral demand for clean energy technologies could increase by 4-6 times by 2040, depending on how rapidly governments move to reduce emissions. This explosive growth creates both opportunities and challenges for securing sustainable supply chains.

Breakdown of the Proposed $1 Billion Funding

The nearly $1 billion funding initiative allocates resources strategically across the critical minerals value chain, focusing on addressing key vulnerabilities in processing, manufacturing, and recovery capabilities. Each funding component targets specific gaps in domestic supply chains.

$500 Million for Processing and Battery Manufacturing

The Department of Energy's Office of Manufacturing and Energy Supply Chains (MESC) has earmarked approximately $500 million—the largest portion of the funding—to expand domestic processing capabilities for critical minerals and materials. This funding prioritizes:

• Advanced separation and purification technologies for battery materials
• Scaling up pilot processing facilities to commercial production
• Developing innovative manufacturing techniques that reduce environmental impacts
• Establishing battery recycling infrastructure to create circular supply chains

This investment addresses a critical vulnerability: while the U.S. has significant mineral resources, it lacks sufficient processing capacity to convert raw materials into high-purity chemicals and components needed for high-tech applications. Currently, even when minerals are mined domestically, they are often shipped overseas for processing.

$135 Million for Rare Earth Elements Recovery

MESC has allocated $135 million specifically for strengthening the domestic rare earth elements supply chain. This funding focuses on demonstrating commercially viable methods to:

• Extract REEs from mining waste and tailings from both active and abandoned mines
• Develop advanced separation technologies that reduce processing costs
• Scale up pilot projects to commercial production levels
• Implement environmentally responsible extraction techniques

This approach is particularly promising because mining waste often contains significant concentrations of valuable rare earth elements that were previously uneconomical to recover. New technologies can now extract these materials while simultaneously remediating environmental liabilities.

$250 Million for Mineral Byproduct Production

The Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management will distribute approximately $250 million in financial assistance for facilities—including coal plants—with potential to produce mineral byproducts from industrial processes. This funding targets:

• Recovery of critical minerals from coal combustion residuals
• Extraction of lithium, gallium, and other elements from power plant waste streams
• Development of dual-purpose facilities that generate both energy and critical minerals
• Implementation of advanced separation technologies at existing industrial sites

This initiative represents an innovative approach to critical minerals recovery, potentially transforming environmental liabilities into valuable assets while creating new revenue streams for traditional energy facilities navigating the clean energy transition.

$50 Million for Semiconductor Materials

The funding package includes up to $50 million specifically for semiconductor supply chain resilience, focusing on processes in the rare earth magnet supply chain. This includes:

• Refining and alloying gallium, germanium, and silicon carbide
• Developing advanced manufacturing techniques for semiconductor-grade materials
• Establishing domestic sources for high-purity precursor chemicals
• Supporting pilot-scale production facilities to demonstrate commercial viability

The semiconductor focus reflects growing recognition of these materials' importance for both economic competitiveness and national security, especially as advanced computing applications in artificial intelligence and quantum computing accelerate.

How Does This Initiative Align with US Policy?

The critical minerals funding initiative represents the implementation of a broader strategic shift in U.S. policy toward securing domestic supply chains for key technologies. This policy evolution spans multiple administrations and reflects growing bipartisan recognition of critical minerals' strategic importance.

Executive Order Implementation

The Department of Energy has explicitly connected this funding initiative to President Trump's executive order on maximizing energy development. The administration views critical minerals development as an essential component of a comprehensive energy security strategy that encompasses both traditional and renewable resources.

The funding implements key provisions from Executive Order 13817 (2017) and Executive Order 13953 (2020), which declared a national emergency with respect to the critical minerals supply chain. These orders directed federal agencies to:

• Identify critical minerals essential to economic and national security
• Develop strategies to reduce dependency on foreign sources
• Streamline permitting processes for domestic production
• Expand international cooperation with reliable partners
• Support private sector domestic capacity development

The current funding initiative translates these policy directives into concrete financial commitments across multiple federal agencies.

Reducing Foreign Dependency

The United States currently imports more than 80% of its rare earth element needs, primarily from China. This dependency extends across numerous critical mineral categories, creating vulnerabilities that the funding initiative aims to address through a comprehensive approach to supply chain resilience.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright emphasized this point, noting that "for too long, the United States has relied on foreign actors to supply and process the critical materials that are essential to modern life and our national security."

The initiative's focus on processing capacity—not just raw material extraction—reflects recognition that true supply chain security requires capabilities across the entire value chain. China's dominance in critical minerals stems not just from mining but from investments in processing, refining, and manufacturing capabilities.

Bipartisan Support for Critical Minerals

While implemented under the current administration, the critical minerals reserve strategy represents a rare area of bipartisan consensus. Both Democratic and Republican administrations have recognized the strategic importance of addressing critical mineral supply chains.

The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act and the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law both contained provisions supporting critical minerals development, indicating policy continuity across administrations. This consistency provides important signals to private investors about the long-term government commitment to building domestic capacity.

What Technologies Will Benefit from This Investment?

The critical minerals funding initiative targets supply chains that underpin key technological sectors central to both economic competitiveness and the clean energy transition. These investments will strengthen America's position in rapidly growing technology markets.

Electric Vehicle Supply Chain

The global electric vehicle market is projected to grow from $287.36 billion in 2021 to $1,318.22 billion by 2028, representing a CAGR of 24.3%. Securing the material supply chains for this growth sector is a key funding priority.

The initiative supports domestic capabilities for producing and processing materials essential for EV batteries:

• Lithium: The average electric vehicle battery requires approximately 8-10 kg of lithium, and global demand is projected to increase 40-fold by 2040. The funding supports projects to extract lithium from geothermal brines and clay deposits found domestically.

• Cobalt: While efforts are underway to reduce cobalt content in batteries, it remains essential for current technology. The U.S. has only one primary cobalt mine but possesses significant undeveloped resources that could be activated with appropriate investment.

• Nickel: Class 1 nickel suitable for batteries represents only about 20% of global nickel production, creating a potential supply bottleneck as EV production accelerates. Domestic processing capacity is essential for converting lower-grade nickel into battery-suitable materials.

• Graphite: As the largest component by weight in lithium-ion batteries, graphite demand is projected to increase 25-fold by 2040. The U.S. currently has no domestic production of the high-purity graphite needed for battery anodes.

By strengthening these supply chains, the funding initiative aims to support the administration's goal of making half of all new vehicles sold in 2030 zero-emissions vehicles.

Semiconductor Manufacturing

The global semiconductor market reached $556 billion in 2021 and is projected to grow to $1,380 billion by 2029. The initiative's $50 million allocation for semiconductor materials addresses critical vulnerabilities in this strategically important sector.

Key materials receiving support include:

• Gallium: Essential for gallium nitride semiconductors used in 5G networks, LEDs, and power electronics. The U.S. has no primary gallium production and relies entirely on imports.

• Germanium: Critical for fiber optics, infrared optics, and certain semiconductor applications. Domestic production is minimal, meeting less than 5% of U.S. demand.

• Silicon Carbide: Enables high-efficiency power electronics that reduce energy losses by up to 50% compared to traditional silicon semiconductors. Domestic manufacturing capacity is limited but growing.

These materials enable next-generation semiconductor applications essential for everything from artificial intelligence to autonomous vehicles and advanced defense systems.

Renewable Energy Components

The renewable energy sector relies heavily on critical minerals for everything from photovoltaic cells to wind turbine magnets. The funding initiative supports several key material supply chains:

• Rare Earth Magnets: A direct-drive wind turbine can contain up to 600 kg of rare earth elements. The funding supports developing domestic capacity for processing rare earths into high-performance magnets.

• Silver and Silicon: Photovoltaic cells require high-purity silicon and silver. The initiative supports advanced manufacturing techniques to reduce material intensity while maintaining performance.

• Energy Storage Materials: Beyond lithium-ion batteries, next-generation storage technologies using flow batteries, thermal storage, and other approaches require specialized materials with secure supply chains.

By addressing these material requirements, the funding initiative supports broader clean energy deployment goals while ensuring the economic benefits of manufacturing remain domestic.

How Will This Impact the US Mining Sector?

The critical minerals funding initiative promises to reshape the American mining landscape, revitalizing a sector that has faced decades of decline while adapting it to 21st-century environmental and technological requirements.

Expansion of Mining Operations

The United States possesses significant geological resources of many critical minerals, but development has lagged due to economic, regulatory, and technical challenges. The funding initiative creates new opportunities for both greenfield development and expansion of existing operations.

Key domestic resources with development potential include:

• Lithium deposits in Nevada, California, Arkansas, and North Carolina, with an estimated 750,000 metric tons of reserves
• Rare earth element deposits in Texas, California, Wyoming, and Alaska
• Nickel and cobalt resources in Minnesota, Idaho, and Missouri
• Graphite deposits in Alabama and Alaska

The American Exploration & Mining Association estimates that over 200 critical mineral projects are in various stages of development across the United States. The funding initiative could accelerate these projects by addressing key technical and economic barriers.

Advanced Processing Technologies

Beyond raw material extraction, the initiative emphasizes developing advanced processing technologies to convert mined materials into high-value products. This focus addresses a critical gap in the U.S. supply chain—the "missing middle" between mining and manufacturing.

Advanced processing technologies receiving support include:

• Solvent extraction and electrowinning processes for rare earth separation
• Lithium extraction technology from brines using selective absorption materials
• High-temperature metallurgical processes for battery-grade nickel and cobalt
• Environmentally responsible leaching techniques that minimize chemical use

These technologies offer significant advantages over conventional processing methods, including reduced environmental footprint, higher recovery rates, and the ability to process lower-grade domestic resources economically.

Recycling and Secondary Recovery

A significant portion of the funding targets technologies for recovering critical minerals from alternative sources, creating new opportunities for the mining sector to expand beyond traditional extraction:

• Mining waste reprocessing: Historic mine tailings often contain valuable critical minerals that were not economically recoverable using older technologies
• Coal ash utilization: Coal combustion residuals can contain significant concentrations of rare earths, lithium, and other valuable elements
• End-of-life product recycling: Developing "urban mining" infrastructure to recover materials from discarded electronics, batteries, and other products

These secondary sources can provide significant material flows with reduced environmental impact compared to traditional mining. For instance, recycling one ton of smartphone batteries can recover more cobalt than processing 150 tons of typical cobalt ore. Recent battery recycling breakthrough technologies have further highlighted the potential in this area.

What Are the Challenges to Implementing This Initiative?

Despite its promising potential, the critical minerals funding initiative faces significant obstacles that could impact its effectiveness. Understanding these challenges is essential for realistic assessment of the program's likely outcomes.

Permitting and Regulatory Hurdles

New mining and processing operations in the United States navigate a complex permitting landscape involving multiple agencies at federal, state, and local levels. This regulatory complexity can create significant delays:

• The average mine permitting process in the U.S. takes 7-10 years, compared to 2-3 years in countries like Australia and Canada with similar environmental standards
• Processing facilities face their own regulatory challenges, particularly regarding air and water quality permits
• Overlapping jurisdiction between agencies creates coordination challenges and potential conflicts

Environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) are particularly time-intensive, with Environmental Impact Statements often requiring 3-5 years to complete. While these reviews serve important environmental protection functions, their timeline can challenge project economics.

Recent permitting reform efforts have aimed to streamline these processes without reducing environmental standards, but significant challenges remain in balancing efficient permitting with thorough environmental review.

Technical and Economic Viability

Many critical mineral deposits in the U.S. are lower grade or more mineralogically complex than those in other countries, creating technical challenges for economically viable extraction and processing:

• Domestic lithium concentrations in brines are typically 200-300 ppm, compared to 1,000+ ppm in South American salars
• U.S. rare earth deposits often contain higher concentrations of thorium, creating additional regulatory and waste management challenges

Want to Stay Ahead of the Next Major Mineral Discovery?

Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model analyses ASX announcements in real-time, delivering instant notifications when significant mineral discoveries are announced—giving you the market edge before others react. Explore how major discoveries have historically generated substantial returns by visiting the Discovery Alert discoveries page and position yourself for investment success.