What Is Mineral Exploration and Why Is It Important?
Mineral exploration is the systematic process of finding economically viable mineral deposits through geological, geophysical, and geochemical methods. It serves as the foundation of the mining industry, providing the essential first step in developing new mineral resources that power our modern world.
According to recent industry data, global mineral exploration budgets reached $15.2 billion USD in 2024, representing a 12% year-over-year increase from 2023. Gold remains the dominant focus, accounting for approximately 48% of all exploration expenditures, followed by copper at 22% and battery metals at 17%.
The critical importance of exploration cannot be overstated—it maintains the resource pipeline for mining companies and ensures sustainability of supply chains for essential materials. Without ongoing mineral exploration and development, existing mines would eventually deplete their reserves with no replacement sources.
"Exploration success rates determine the mining industry's pipeline sustainability," notes Tom Brewington, a seasoned mining engineer at Sandstorm Gold. "The industry faces a fundamental challenge: only about 1 in 1,000 exploration projects ever progresses to production."
This reality underscores the high-risk, high-reward nature of mineral exploration. Companies typically progress through several well-defined exploration phases, starting with reconnaissance surveys over large areas, then narrowing to target generation, and finally conducting detailed resource definition with drill spacing of 20 meters or less in promising zones.
A compelling illustration of exploration's long-term impact is Nevada's Carlin Trend discovery in the 1960s. What began as a single exploration program has extended into over 60 years of continuous gold production, demonstrating how successful exploration creates multi-generational economic benefits.
How Do Geologists Describe Mineral Deposits?
To understand mineral deposits, geologists use specific geometric terminology that describes the orientation and dimensions of ore bodies. These terms form the foundation of resource estimation and mine planning.
Strike refers to the compass direction of a horizontal line along the surface of an inclined plane. It indicates the bearing of the deposit relative to true north. For instance, a vein might strike at 045° (northeast).
Dip measures the steepness of the deposit's inclination from horizontal, expressed in degrees. Vein orientations vary significantly by deposit type—porphyry and epithermal deposits commonly exhibit dips of 65° ±15°, while some deposits like those in Tanzania's Bulyanhulu Mine feature near-vertical dips of 85°, requiring specialized mining techniques.
Thickness represents the perpendicular distance between the hanging wall and footwall of a deposit. This measurement is crucial for calculating tonnage and determining appropriate mining methods.
Modern exploration relies heavily on 3D modeling software such as Leapfrog Geo to visualize these geometric relationships. These programs transform strike, dip, and thickness data into comprehensive three-dimensional models that guide resource estimation.
Understanding deposit geometry dramatically impacts mining economics. When Bulyanhulu's near-vertical veins were discovered, engineers had to design custom decline development systems to access the ore effectively—a decision that added significant upfront capital costs but enabled profitable extraction of high-grade material.
What's The Difference Between Apparent Thickness and True Thickness?
One of the most common misunderstandings in resource reporting involves the difference between apparent thickness and true thickness—a distinction that can significantly impact resource calculations and investment decisions.
Apparent thickness represents the length of mineralization intersected by a drill hole. However, this measurement can be misleading if the drill hole intersects the deposit at an angle rather than perpendicular to the structure.
True thickness—the actual width of the mineralized zone—is calculated using trigonometric relationships. The formula is:
True thickness = Apparent thickness × sin(θ)
Where θ represents the angle between the drill hole and the vein orientation.
Consider this practical example: a drill hole reports a 25-meter mineralized intersection at a 30° angle to the vein. Using the formula:
True thickness = 25m × sin(30°) = 25m × 0.5 = 12.5m
This calculation reveals that the actual thickness of the deposit is only half of what the raw drilling result suggests—a critical distinction for accurate resource estimation.
Investors should pay careful attention to true thickness reporting in press releases. Companies that consistently report only apparent thickness without correction may be (intentionally or unintentionally) overstating their resource potential.
The implications for resource calculations are substantial. A 2019 project in Red Lake, Ontario, experienced a 40% reduction in resource tonnage after correcting apparent thickness measurements—dramatically affecting project economics and ultimately leading to a significant share price correction.
How Does Drill Hole Surveying Work?
As exploration drill holes extend deeper underground—often exceeding 1,000 meters—they naturally deviate from their planned paths due to geological structures, rock hardness variations, and mechanical factors.
This deviation can be substantial, with holes commonly wandering up to 30 meters from their intended targets at depth. Without proper surveying, geologists would be modeling resources at incorrect spatial positions, potentially missing high-grade zones or including barren rock in resource calculations.
Modern downhole surveying employs two primary technologies:
Gyroscopic (north-seeking) systems use Earth's rotation to determine true north, providing accurate measurements even in areas with magnetic interference from mineralization. These systems can achieve accuracy within ±0.1° but are more expensive to deploy.
Magnetic systems measure the Earth's magnetic field to determine orientation. While more affordable, they can produce unreliable readings near magnetite-rich deposits or when steel drill rods interfere with measurements.
Survey readings are typically taken every 30-50 meters during drilling, with deviations averaging 3-5° per 100 meters drilled. The resulting three-dimensional path becomes the foundation for accurate resource modeling.
The importance of proper surveying is illustrated by a 2022 incident at the Argenta project, where inadequate hole surveying led to a 23% overstatement of resources. When proper surveys were conducted during the mining feasibility studies, the corrected model showed significantly less tonnage, ultimately rendering the project uneconomic.
National Instrument 43-101 and similar international reporting standards now mandate rigorous downhole surveying protocols for resource estimation. While surveying adds approximately $15-$25 per meter to drilling budgets, this cost is insignificant compared to the potential financial impact of resource misestimation.
What Is Kriging and How Does It Affect Resource Estimation?
Named after South African mining engineer Danie G. Krige, kriging represents the gold standard in geostatistical estimation for mineral resources. This sophisticated mathematical technique optimizes the accuracy of resource models by considering both the distance between samples and their spatial relationships.
At its core, kriging is a form of weighted averaging that assigns greater influence to nearby samples while accounting for directional trends in mineralization. Unlike simple averaging methods, kriging adjusts for sampling clusters to prevent overweighting areas with dense drilling.
The process relies on variogram analysis—a statistical tool that quantifies how sample similarity changes with distance and direction. Three key variogram parameters control the estimation:
- Nugget effect: Represents random variability between adjacent samples
- Sill: The maximum variability between samples regardless of distance
- Range: The distance at which samples become statistically independent
When properly applied, kriging reduces estimation variance by 18-25% compared to traditional polygonal methods, resulting in more reliable resource models.
The benefits extend beyond accuracy. By quantifying estimation uncertainty, kriging helps classify resources into measured, indicated, and inferred categories based on statistical confidence. It also identifies areas requiring additional drilling to improve resource certainty.
A notable example of kriging's impact comes from Chile's Escondida copper mine, where implementing advanced kriging methods improved grade control by 8%, translating to millions in additional annual revenue.
While kriging requires specialized expertise and software, its adoption has become standard practice for serious mining companies. Alternative methods like inverse distance weighting may be suitable for early-stage projects, but kriging remains superior for definitive resource estimation.
How Are Mineral Resources Classified?
Mineral resources are classified into categories that reflect confidence levels based on geological knowledge, sampling density, and estimation quality. These classifications directly impact how investors, regulators, and mining companies value projects.
Measured resources represent the highest confidence category, typically requiring drill spacing of 25 meters or less. This tight spacing provides approximately 90% confidence in tonnage and grade estimates, allowing mining companies to make production decisions with minimal risk.
Indicated resources reflect moderate confidence with drill spacing between 25-100 meters, depending on deposit type. This category carries approximately 70-80% confidence in estimates—sufficient for preliminary economic assessments but requiring additional drilling before full mine development.
Inferred resources represent the lowest confidence category, based on wider-spaced drilling (>100 meters) or geological inference. With only about 50% confidence in tonnage and grade, inferred resources cannot support economic decisions but identify areas with potential for upgrade through additional drilling.
The drilling density requirements vary significantly by deposit type. For example:
- Narrow vein gold deposits may require 10-15m spacing for measured classification
- Porphyry copper deposits might allow 40-50m spacing for the same confidence level
- Stratiform deposits can sometimes achieve measured status with 60-80m spacing
Resource classification has real-world financial implications. Banks typically only finance projects based on measured and indicated resources, while mining companies apply progressively higher discount rates to each category when calculating net present value (NPV).
International reporting standards like the JORC Code (Australia) and NI 43-101 (Canada) establish guidelines for resource classification, though they intentionally leave room for the "Qualified Person" to apply professional judgment based on the specific geological characteristics of each deposit.
What's The Critical Difference Between Resources and Reserves?
The distinction between mineral resources and mineral reserves represents one of the most fundamental concepts in mining economics—yet one frequently misunderstood by investors.
While resources represent in-situ mineralization defined by drilling, reserves exclusively represent the economically extractable portion of resources after applying modifying factors including mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, and social considerations.
The conversion from resources to reserves involves a rigorous process that includes detailed engineering studies, permitting assessments, and financial analysis. Many promising resources never achieve reserve status due to these real-world constraints.
Mining dilution represents a critical factor in this conversion. When mining a 1-foot wide high-grade vein, operators must extract additional waste rock to create a minimum working width (often 2 meters or more). This dilution formula quantifies the impact:
Mined Grade = (Vein Grade Ă— Vein Width) Ă· Mining Width
For example, a 1-meter vein grading 20 g/t gold, when mined at a 2-meter minimum width, results in a diluted grade of just 10 g/t:
Mined Grade = (20 g/t Ă— 1m) Ă· 2m = 10 g/t
Additionally, reserves must account for ore losses during mining, typically 5-15% depending on the mining method. Together, dilution and losses often reduce the contained metal in reserves by 25-40% compared to resources.
Regulatory requirements for reserve reporting are stringent. Both NI 43-101 and JORC codes mandate that reserves be supported by at least a pre-feasibility study demonstrating economic viability under reasonable technical, economic, and legal assumptions.
Investors should note that only measured resources can convert to proven reserves, and only indicated resources can convert to probable reserves. Inferred resources cannot be converted to reserves without additional drilling to upgrade classification.
How Do Mining Companies Calculate Cut-Off Grades?
The cut-off grade—the minimum grade at which material becomes ore rather than waste—serves as the economic dividing line in mining operations. This single parameter dramatically impacts reserve size, mine life, and project economics.
Mining companies calculate cut-off grade using a formula that incorporates all costs and recovery factors:
Cut-off Grade = Total Costs Ă· (Commodity Price Ă— Recovery Rate)
Where:
- Total costs include mining, processing, general/administrative expenses, and sustaining capital
- Recovery rate represents the percentage of metal recovered through processing
For example, with gold at $2,000/oz, recovery of 90%, and total costs of $45/tonne, the cut-off grade would be:
Cut-off Grade = $45 Ă· ($2,000 Ă— 90%) = $45 Ă· $1,800 = 0.025 oz/ton (or 0.78 g/t)
This means only material containing at least 0.78 g/t gold would generate profit when processed.
Mining companies often employ different cut-off grades for different purposes:
- Economic cut-off: The break-even grade for processing
- Operational cut-off: Often higher than economic cut-off to maximize profit
- Marginal cut-off: Lower grade used during periods of high metal prices
Strategic considerations also influence cut-off grade decisions. Companies may deliberately lower cut-off grades to extend mine life, even at reduced margins, to maintain workforce stability and community relationships.
Cut-off grade sensitivity analysis forms a critical component of feasibility studies. A project's economics might change dramatically with small variations in cut-off grade, particularly for deposits with skewed grade distributions.
As metal prices fluctuate, companies regularly reassess cut-off grades. During the 2011-2012 gold price peak, many operations lowered cut-off grades to process previously uneconomic material, only to revert to higher cut-offs when prices declined in subsequent years.
What Recovery Factors Impact Mineral Processing?
Mineral recovery—the percentage of valuable metal extracted during processing—critically influences project economics yet varies substantially based on mineralogy, processing method, and ore characteristics.
Typical recovery rates by mineral and process include:
- Gold: 85-95% (cyanide leaching), 60-80% (gravity concentration)
- Copper: 70-85% (flotation), 80-90% (oxide leaching)
- Zinc: 75-90% (flotation)
- Rare earth elements: 40-70% (mixed processes)
These percentages directly impact revenue calculations. For instance, a deposit containing 1 million ounces of gold with 90% recovery effectively contains only 900,000 recoverable ounces.
Multiple technical challenges affect recovery rates. Refractory ores, where minerals are encapsulated in sulfides or carbon, may require pressure oxidation or roasting before conventional processing, reducing recovery and increasing costs. Fine grain size distribution can lead to slimes formation during flotation, carrying valuable minerals into tailings.
Metallurgical testing progresses through increasingly detailed stages during project development:
- Preliminary bench tests (10-50kg samples)
- Variability testing across the deposit (100-500kg)
- Pilot plant operations (1-5 tonnes)
- Continuous plant trials (50+ tonnes)
Each stage provides greater confidence in recovery projections, with pilot testing being particularly crucial for complex ores.
Recovery assumptions significantly impact feasibility studies. A seemingly minor 5% reduction in projected recovery (from 90% to 85%) can reduce project NPV by 15-20%—potentially shifting a project from economic to uneconomic.
Environmental factors increasingly influence recovery optimization. Processes that might achieve slightly higher recoveries but use toxic chemicals or consume excessive energy may be rejected in favor of more sustainable alternatives with somewhat lower recoveries.
How To Interpret Exploration Results Like A Professional
Evaluating drilling results requires understanding both what companies emphasize and—more importantly—what they might omit from press releases. Professional interpretation focuses on several key indicators and potential red flags.
When assessing high-grade intercepts, consider these critical factors:
- True thickness (not just apparent thickness)
- Continuity between holes
- Depth from surface (impacts economics)
- Cut vs. uncut grades (especially for gold with nugget effect)
Benchmark intercepts vary significantly by deposit type and mining method:
- Open-pit gold: >0.5 g/t over 50+ meters
- Underground gold: >5 g/t over 3+ meters
- Porphyry copper: >0.4% Cu equivalent over 100+ meters
- VMS deposits: >1% Cu equivalent over 10+ meters
Red flags in exploration announcements include:
- Selective reporting of only best intercepts without showing all results
- Missing QA/QC data on sample preparation and lab procedures
- Unclear disclosure of true thickness vs. apparent thickness
- Emphasis on exceptional grades without discussing continuity
- Absence of plan maps or sections showing hole locations
Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) protocols are particularly critical. Professional geologists look for insertion of certified reference materials (standards), blanks, and duplicates at rates of at least 1 in 20 samples. The absence of these controls suggests potential data quality issues.
When companies report composite intervals, check the cut-off grade and maximum internal dilution allowed. Some companies use aggressive compositing rules that include substantial barren material within reported "mineralized" intervals.
Context matters significantly. A 10-meter interval grading 2 g/t gold might be excellent in a bulk-tonnage setting but subeconomic in a narrow-vein underground scenario where mining costs are much higher.
Verification procedures differentiate professional analysis from amateur interpretation. Checking assay certificates, confirming sampling methodology, and reviewing the credentials of the qualified person signing off on results provides assurance that reported [drilling results
Ready to Stay Ahead of the Next Major Mineral Discovery?
Don't miss out on potentially transformative investment opportunities—Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model delivers instant notifications on significant ASX mineral discoveries, turning complex geological data into actionable insights. Explore why historic discoveries can generate substantial returns by visiting Discovery Alert's dedicated discoveries page and begin your 30-day free trial today.
