Global Coal Investments Surge Amid Energy Demand in 2025

Coal power plants contrast renewable energy sources.

Why Is Coal Investment Increasing in 2025?

The global landscape of energy investment is experiencing a significant shift, with coal-fired power plants receiving unprecedented attention despite international climate commitments. Global approvals for coal-fired plants have reached their highest level since 2015, marking a dramatic reversal of the anticipated decline in fossil fuel investments.

China stands at the forefront of this coal renaissance, having commenced construction on approximately 100 gigawatts of new coal plants in 2024 alone. This massive expansion represents a capacity equivalent to the entire existing coal fleet of countries like Germany and Japan combined.

The Environmental Contradiction

This surge in coal investment presents a stark contradiction to global climate goals. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), coal remains the largest source of energy-related emissions, accounting for a staggering 45% of the global total. The continued expansion of coal capacity threatens to undermine international efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.

"While the long-term trajectory towards renewables remains intact, the path is proving far more complex than many anticipated as countries grapple with energy security and affordability concerns," explains Anthony Knutson, Wood Mackenzie's global head of thermal coal markets.

Energy Security Trumps Climate Concerns

The resurgence in coal investment can be largely attributed to pressing energy security considerations. Following recent geopolitical instabilities and global supply chain disruptions, many nations are prioritizing reliable energy access over environmental concerns.

Coal, with its established infrastructure and domestic availability in many regions, offers a perceived stability that newer renewable technologies haven't yet matched at scale. This security-focused approach is particularly evident in developing economies experiencing rapid industrialization and electricity demand growth.

Expert Insight: "The reality on the ground differs significantly from policy rhetoric. Nations are making pragmatic choices based on immediate energy security needs while balancing longer-term climate commitments," notes industry analysts at Wood Mackenzie.

Economic Calculus in Emerging Markets

For rapidly growing economies like China and India, the economic calculus continues to favor coal for several compelling reasons:

  • Lower upfront costs: Coal-fired plants require less initial capital investment compared to equivalent renewable capacity plus storage
  • Existing expertise: Workforce familiarity and established operational knowledge
  • Immediate availability: Rapid deployment capability to meet surging electricity demand
  • Supply chain control: Less dependence on imported technology and components

The affordability factor cannot be overlooked. In developing nations where expanding energy access remains a priority, the short-term cost-effectiveness of coal often outweighs long-term environmental considerations, creating a fundamental tension between immediate development needs and climate imperatives.

What Do Expert Forecasts Reveal About Coal's Future?

Despite the current surge in coal investments, long-term forecasts present contrasting scenarios for coal's future in the global energy mix. Wood Mackenzie's comprehensive energy analysis outlines two dramatically different trajectories that could shape the next three decades of energy production.

Base-Case Scenario: Renewable Dominance

Wood Mackenzie's base-case Energy Transition Outlook projects a dramatic 70% decline in coal-fired power generation between 2025 and 2050. This substantial reduction would be driven by several converging factors:

  • Continued decreases in renewable energy technology costs
  • Significant advancements in battery storage capabilities
  • Renewed interest and investment in nuclear energy
  • Expansion of natural gas capacity as a transition fuel

This scenario aligns with most international climate agreements and represents the path many policy experts consider necessary to meet global emissions reduction targets.

High Coal Demand Scenario: Prolonged Fossil Fuel Dominance

In stark contrast, Wood Mackenzie's alternative "high coal demand" case suggests coal generation could average 32% higher than the base case through 2050. This scenario would see global coal fleets optimized to meet rapid electricity demand growth, particularly in developing economies.

The implications of this alternative path are profound:

  • 2,100GW less global wind, solar, energy storage, and natural gas capacity
  • Substantial increase in carbon emissions without mitigation technology
  • Two billion tonnes more unabated emissions compared to the base case

"We're talking about delaying the phase-out of the world's most carbon-intensive fuel source during a critical decade for climate action," warns Anthony Knutson of Wood Mackenzie.

The Carbon Capture Imperative

Without significant deployment of carbon capture solutions and storage (CCS) technologies, continued coal usage at the levels projected in the high demand scenario would make meeting climate targets virtually impossible. The two billion tonne increase in emissions represents approximately twice Japan's annual carbon output—a massive addition to the global carbon budget.

Critical Context: The high coal demand scenario would require either extraordinary advances in carbon capture technology or a fundamental reassessment of global climate targets, as the two are incompatible without technological intervention.

The divergence between these scenarios highlights the critical importance of energy policy decisions being made today, which will shape the trajectory of global emissions for decades to come.

The coal export market is experiencing notable geographic shifts and operational challenges that reflect the complex dynamics of this transitional period in global energy.

Australia's Export Challenges

Australia, a major global coal exporter, faced significant disruptions in early 2025, with export volumes declining 9.7% in the March quarter compared to the same period in 2024. According to the Department of Industry, Science and Resources (DISR), these reductions were primarily attributed to:

  • Unusually wet weather impacting mining operations
  • Operational incidents at several key mine sites
  • Supply chain disruptions affecting transportation networks

The DISR forecasts recovery in the remainder of 2025 as these disruptions subside, but the temporary downturn highlights the vulnerability of coal supply chains to both operational and climate-related incidents—an irony not lost on industry observers.

Geographic Demand Shifts

Perhaps more significant than temporary supply disruptions are the structural shifts occurring in demand patterns across Asia:

  • China: Declining demand represents a potential downside risk for traditional exporters
  • India: Rapidly growing coal imports to fuel industrial expansion
  • Southeast Asia: Emerging as a crucial growth market for coal exporters

This geographic diversification has become an essential strategy for coal-producing nations like Australia. "The diversity of Australia's target markets provides some mitigation against the risk of declining Chinese demand," notes the DISR report cited by Small Caps.

Strategic Market Positioning

Coal producers are increasingly focused on market diversification as a buffer against regional demand fluctuations. This strategic repositioning involves:

  1. Developing stronger trade relationships with emerging markets
  2. Investing in supply chain resilience to withstand disruptions
  3. Exploring higher-value coal products for specialized markets
  4. Optimizing production costs to remain competitive

Market Insight: Coal quality is becoming increasingly important in export markets, with higher energy content, lower ash coal commanding premium prices despite the overall pressure on the sector.

The coal export landscape is thus characterized by both short-term volatility and long-term strategic realignment as producers navigate the complex transition period ahead.

What Challenges Face the Energy Transition Away From Coal?

The path toward renewable energy dominance faces several significant obstacles that help explain coal's persistent role in the global energy mix. These challenges must be addressed for the energy transition to accelerate at the pace required by climate targets.

Technical and Infrastructure Hurdles

Renewable energy technologies, despite rapid cost declines, still face implementation challenges that coal-fired generation does not:

  • Intermittency issues: Solar and wind generation fluctuate with weather conditions, requiring substantial storage solutions
  • Grid infrastructure limitations: Many regions lack the advanced grid systems needed to manage variable renewable inputs
  • Land use requirements: Renewable projects often require significantly more physical space per unit of energy produced
  • Manufacturing constraints: Supply chains for critical components face bottlenecks and material shortages

These technical limitations help explain why, despite economic advantages in many markets, renewables haven't displaced coal more rapidly in developing economies with surging energy demand.

The Carbon Capture Question

According to Wood Mackenzie's analysis, without significant investment in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, continued coal usage presents substantial climate risks. The high coal demand scenario would increase emissions by two billion tonnes compared to the base case—a gap that would need to be closed through technological intervention.

However, CCS technology faces its own implementation challenges:

  • High capital costs for retrofitting existing plants
  • Energy penalties that reduce overall plant efficiency
  • Limited commercial-scale deployment experience
  • Underdeveloped regulatory frameworks and carbon pricing mechanisms

Technical Context: Modern CCS technology can capture up to 90% of carbon emissions from coal plants, but the added cost (estimated at $50-$100 per tonne of CO₂) remains a significant barrier to widespread adoption without stronger policy support.

Workforce and Community Transitions

The shift away from coal involves not just technological but social challenges. Coal-dependent communities face significant economic disruption during the transition, including:

  • Job losses in mining and power generation sectors
  • Reduced local tax bases and public service funding
  • Cultural and identity impacts in historically coal-dependent regions
  • Need for worker retraining and economic diversification

Addressing these social dimensions of the energy transition is essential for building the political support necessary for sustained policy action on climate change.

How Can Nations Balance Energy Security and Climate Goals?

Nations worldwide face the challenging task of balancing immediate energy security concerns with long-term climate commitments. This balancing act requires sophisticated policy approaches that recognize both imperatives without sacrificing either.

Strategic Approaches to Energy Planning

Successful energy transitions require thoughtful planning that acknowledges the complex realities facing different regions:

  • Phased transition approaches: Gradually reducing coal dependence through staged retirement of plants
  • Hybrid energy systems: Combining coal with increasing renewable capacity during transition periods
  • Regional differentiation: Tailoring transition timelines based on economic development stages and resource availability
  • International cooperation: Technology transfer and climate finance mechanisms to accelerate transitions

Wood Mackenzie's contrasting scenarios (70% decline in coal use versus 32% higher coal use) illustrate the magnitude of difference that policy choices can make over the coming decades.

Investment Realignment Strategies

The financial dimensions of the energy transition require careful management:

  1. Carbon pricing mechanisms: Creating economic incentives for cleaner technologies
  2. Just transition funds: Providing support for affected workers and communities
  3. Green finance initiatives: Mobilizing capital for renewable energy projects
  4. Risk disclosure requirements: Ensuring investors understand climate-related financial risks

Policy Insight: The most successful transitions combine predictable long-term policy frameworks with flexible implementation approaches that can adapt to changing technological and economic conditions.

Balancing Competing Priorities

The tension between energy security and climate goals is particularly acute in developing economies, where:

  • Energy access remains a development priority
  • Per capita emissions are often lower than in developed economies
  • Financial resources for transition investments may be limited
  • Energy infrastructure is still being built, creating opportunities for leapfrogging

"Nations must find pathways that ensure reliable, affordable energy access while progressively decarbonizing their economies," notes the Wood Mackenzie analysis, highlighting the need for balanced approaches rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.

The Role of International Support

For many developing economies, international climate finance will be crucial in enabling transitions away from coal:

  • Technology transfer programs: Sharing technical expertise and innovations
  • Concessional financing: Providing below-market rates for clean energy projects
  • Capacity building initiatives: Developing local expertise in renewable technologies
  • Climate adaptation funding: Supporting resilience to already-occurring climate impacts

The success of global climate efforts ultimately depends on making clean energy the most attractive option not just environmentally but economically and from an energy security perspective.

FAQ: Understanding Coal's Position in Global Energy

How does coal consumption impact climate targets?

Coal combustion produces approximately twice the carbon dioxide emissions per unit of energy compared to natural gas and significantly more than any renewable source. With coal accounting for 45% of energy-related emissions globally, its continued use at current levels would make meeting Paris Agreement targets virtually impossible. The Wood Mackenzie high coal demand scenario would add approximately two billion tonnes of emissions—about twice Japan's annual carbon output—compared to their base case projection.

What factors might accelerate coal's decline?

Several factors could hasten coal's phase-out globally:

  • Stricter emissions regulations and carbon pricing mechanisms
  • Continued cost reductions in renewable technologies
  • Breakthroughs in grid-scale energy storage capabilities
  • Increased investor pressure against fossil fuel assets
  • Stronger international climate agreements with enforcement mechanisms
  • Public health concerns related to air pollution from coal combustion

The convergence of these factors could create tipping points in markets where coal currently remains competitive.

How are developing nations addressing the coal dilemma?

Developing economies are pursuing various strategies to balance energy needs with environmental concerns:

  • Implementing cleaner coal technologies as transitional measures
  • Seeking international climate finance for renewable energy projects
  • Developing hybrid energy systems that combine coal with renewables
  • Establishing long-term phase-out plans while meeting immediate energy needs
  • Exploring regional power sharing to optimize resource use
  • Prioritizing energy efficiency to reduce overall demand growth

These approaches reflect the complex reality that energy transitions must occur at different paces in different regions based on their unique circumstances and development needs.

Global Coal's Uncertain Future

The surge in global coal investments represents a critical inflection point in the world's energy transition journey. Despite overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change, immediate energy security and economic development imperatives continue to drive coal expansion, particularly in rapidly growing economies.

Wood Mackenzie's divergent scenarios—with coal generation declining by 70% or potentially remaining 32% higher than the base case—illustrate the enormous consequences of today's energy policy decisions. The difference between these paths represents not just different energy systems but fundamentally different climate futures.

For investors, policymakers, and citizens worldwide, understanding these complex dynamics is essential for navigating the energy transition effectively. As Anthony Knutson of Wood Mackenzie notes, "While the long-term trajectory towards renewables remains intact, the path is proving far more complex than many anticipated."

The coming decade will prove decisive in determining whether coal's current resurgence represents a last gasp for a declining industry or a more prolonged role in the global energy mix—with profound implications for international climate goals.

The global coal investments surge amid energy demand presents not only investment opportunities insights but also significant coal supply challenges that will shape the industry's future. Meanwhile, export challenges in Australia and growing South Africa coal mining operations further illustrate the complex global landscape of this controversial energy source.

Looking to Capitalise on the Next Major Mineral Discovery?

Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model instantly notifies investors of significant ASX mineral discoveries, providing actionable insights that could help you position your portfolio ahead of the market. Explore why historic discoveries have generated substantial returns by visiting Discovery Alert's dedicated discoveries page and begin your 30-day free trial today.

Share This Article

Latest News

Share This Article

Latest Articles

About the Publisher

Disclosure

Discovery Alert does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in its articles. The information does not constitute financial or investment advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own due diligence or speak to a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Please Fill Out The Form Below

Please Fill Out The Form Below

Please Fill Out The Form Below