US Prioritises Recovery of Critical Minerals from Mine Waste

What Are Critical Minerals and Why Is Mine Waste Recovery Important?

Critical minerals are essential resources used in advanced technologies, renewable energy systems, and defense applications. These vital materials—including rare earth elements, lithium, cobalt, and specialized metals—form the backbone of modern manufacturing and technological advancement.

The recovery of these minerals from mine waste represents both a strategic opportunity and an environmental imperative. With the United States currently importing 100% of 14 critical minerals and heavily dependent on foreign sources for dozens more, waste recovery offers a path to greater resource security.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum emphasized this dual benefit, stating: "This initiative reflects our unwavering commitment to achieving mineral independence while turning environmental challenges into opportunities for growth and innovation."

Key Critical Minerals Being Recovered

• Rare earth elements: Essential components in electronics, wind turbines, electric vehicle motors, and advanced defense technologies including precision-guided weapons systems

• Lithium: The cornerstone of energy storage technologies, particularly lithium-ion batteries powering everything from smartphones to grid-scale storage systems

• Cobalt: Critical for EV battery cathodes, providing stability and longevity while enhancing thermal performance in aerospace applications

• Zinc and germanium: Vital for electronics manufacturing, with germanium particularly important in infrared optics, fiber optics, and semiconductor applications

• Tellurium: A semi-conductor material critical for next-generation solar panels and defense technologies including thermal imaging systems

How Is the US Government Prioritizing Mine Waste Recovery?

The U.S. government's approach to mine waste recovery represents a significant policy shift, marked by concrete actions announced on July 24, 2025. This initiative follows Trump executive order invoking the Defense Production Act—a move that classified critical minerals as essential to national security.

Interior Department's Strategic Directive

• Streamlining federal regulations specifically for critical mineral recovery from waste sites, reducing permitting timelines while maintaining environmental standards

• Updating guidance to make waste recovery projects eligible for federal funding through programs previously limited to conventional mining operations

• Expediting reviews of plans to recover uranium and other strategic minerals from the thousands of abandoned mines across the American West

• Directing the US Geological Survey to comprehensively map and inventory federal mine waste sites, creating the first national database of secondary mineral resources

• Supporting the March 2025 executive order by developing implementation guidelines that prioritize waste recovery projects with national security implications

Goals Behind the Initiative

• Achieving mineral independence from foreign sources, particularly for materials essential to defense and energy technologies

• Securing domestic supply chains for advanced technologies including quantum computing, artificial intelligence infrastructure, and next-generation energy systems

• Converting environmental liabilities into economic opportunities, particularly in former mining communities facing economic challenges

• Attracting private investment in waste recovery projects through regulatory certainty and potential federal funding partnerships

• Supporting environmental reclamation of legacy mining sites while simultaneously extracting valuable resources

What Types of Mine Waste Contain Recoverable Minerals?

The United States has accumulated billions of tons of mine waste over centuries of resource extraction. Modern analysis reveals these waste streams often contain significant concentrations of minerals that were either not targeted in original operations or couldn't be economically recovered using historical technologies.

Primary Sources of Mineral-Rich Waste

• Mine Tailings: Fine-grained waste material remaining after ore processing, often containing valuable minerals that weren't economically extractable using older technologies. The U.S. has an estimated 50+ billion tons of mine tailings nationwide, according to USGS assessments.

• Coal Refuse: Waste material from coal mining operations that often contains rare earth elements and other critical minerals at concentrations sometimes exceeding those found in dedicated mines elsewhere in the world.

• Abandoned Uranium Mines: Sites containing residual uranium and associated minerals including vanadium, molybdenum, and selenium. The southwestern United States alone contains over 4,000 abandoned uranium mines with recovery potential.

• Leach Piles: Previously processed material thought to be depleted but containing significant mineral content recoverable with modern methods. These piles often contain 15-30% of the original target mineral.

• Historic Mining Districts: Legacy sites with waste containing minerals not originally targeted during initial extraction. Western mining districts often contain over a dozen critical minerals in waste piles that were focused solely on gold or silver production.

Case Study: Tar Creek Mines

The abandoned lead and zinc mines near Picher, Oklahoma represent a prime example of waste-to-resource potential. These operations, which closed in the 1970s after nearly a century of production, left behind approximately 75 million tons of waste material.

"The Tar Creek site exemplifies both the challenge and opportunity in mine reclamation importance. What was once viewed solely as an environmental liability is now recognized as a significant domestic source of zinc and germanium—both minerals the U.S. currently imports in large quantities." — USGS assessment

Modern analysis has revealed this waste contains economically significant concentrations of:

• Zinc (essential for galvanizing and die-casting)
• Germanium (critical for fiber optics and infrared applications)
• Gallium (used in semiconductors and LED production)

Converting this Superfund site from environmental liability to resource asset demonstrates the potential of the waste recovery approach.

What Economic Potential Does Mine Waste Recovery Offer?

The economic opportunity presented by mine waste recovery is substantial, combining resource value with environmental remediation benefits. Industry leaders are increasingly viewing these projects as core to their business strategy rather than peripheral activities.

Production Estimates and Industry Adoption

Freeport-McMoRan, one of North America's largest copper producers, exemplifies the scale of this opportunity. The company has announced plans to produce 800 million pounds (362,900 metric tons) of copper annually by 2027 through waste recovery initiatives. This production will come from leaching previously discarded waste piles at their existing operations.

This represents more than just incremental production—it constitutes a fundamental shift in resource economics. According to the company's 2024 Sustainability Report, these recovery projects will:

• Require 70% less capital investment than new mine development
• Generate 40-60% lower carbon emissions per pound of copper produced
• Create hundreds of technical jobs in communities with existing mining infrastructure
• Extend mine life without expanding physical footprints

Industry analysts have described waste recovery as a "net-zero, multi-billion dollar opportunity" that could transform mining economics while supporting climate goals.

"We're witnessing a paradigm shift in how mining companies view waste materials. What was once a liability requiring long-term management is increasingly recognized as a valuable secondary resource awaiting recovery." — Mining industry assessment

Bingham Canyon Example

Utah's historic Bingham Canyon operation provides another compelling example of economic potential. The site, already famous as the largest human-made excavation on Earth, has pioneered tellurium recovery from copper mining tailings.

Tellurium—vital for advanced solar panels and defense technologies including thermal imaging systems—occurs in Bingham Canyon waste at concentrations that make recovery economically viable. This demonstrates how previously overlooked minerals can be extracted from existing waste streams, providing strategic materials without new mining disturbances.

The economic potential extends beyond direct mineral value to include:

• Reduced remediation costs for legacy sites
• Decreased waste management expenses
• Lower permitting and startup timelines compared to new mines
• Potential carbon credits or environmental incentives

What Challenges Must Be Overcome for Successful Waste Recovery?

Despite the compelling economic and strategic case for mine waste recovery, significant challenges must be addressed before widespread implementation becomes reality. These obstacles span technical, environmental, legal, and economic domains.

Technical and Environmental Hurdles

• Development of specialized processing methods: Recovery from waste often requires different techniques than primary ore processing, with minerals frequently bound in complex matrices requiring selective extraction.

• Lower concentration gradients: Waste materials typically contain lower concentrations of target minerals than virgin ore, necessitating more efficient separation technologies and greater processing volumes.

• Energy and water requirements: Processing techniques must balance resource recovery with environmental inputs, particularly in water-stressed regions of the American West where many mining sites are located.

• Contaminant management: Historic waste often contains potentially harmful substances including arsenic, mercury, and lead that must be safely separated and sequestered during recovery operations.

"The technical challenge isn't just extracting the valuable minerals—it's doing so while ensuring the remaining waste is less harmful than before we started." — Environmental engineering perspective

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

The legal landscape surrounding mine waste recovery presents unique complications not faced in conventional mining:

• Property rights complications: Abandoned mine sites often have unclear ownership structures, with mineral rights sometimes separated from surface rights, creating complex legal entanglements.

• Liability concerns: Companies undertaking recovery projects may fear assuming liability for legacy contamination they didn't create, necessitating clear regulatory frameworks for liability protection.

• Permitting processes: Current regulations often lack clear pathways for waste reprocessing, with projects sometimes caught between mining, waste management, and remediation regulatory frameworks.

• Ownership determination: Legal questions surround who owns minerals in historic waste—original mine operators, current property owners, or in some cases, the federal government.

The permitting challenges are exemplified by projects like Arizona's Rosemont Mine, where litigation over waste material classification delayed operations for years despite significant economic potential.

How Does Mine Waste Recovery Support Environmental Goals?

Beyond economic and strategic benefits, mine waste recovery offers substantial environmental advantages compared to conventional mining. This alignment with sustainability transformation objectives makes these projects increasingly attractive to both regulators and environmentally conscious investors.

Environmental Benefits

• Remediation of existing mine waste sites: Recovery projects can simultaneously extract valuable minerals while reducing environmental hazards at legacy sites. EPA studies indicate that properly designed recovery operations can reduce acid mine drainage by 60-85% at treated sites.

• Reduction of acid mine drainage: Many mine waste piles generate acidic runoff when rainwater interacts with sulfide minerals. Recovery operations can remove these reactive components, substantially reducing long-term water quality impacts.

• Decreased need for new mining operations: Every ton of minerals recovered from waste potentially offsets a ton that would otherwise require new land disturbance, habitat disruption, and ecosystem impact.

• Lower overall environmental footprint: MIT lifecycle analyses indicate waste recovery typically generates 30-50% lower greenhouse gas emissions per unit of mineral produced compared to conventional mining.

• Potential for carbon-neutral mineral production: When powered by renewable energy, waste recovery operations can approach carbon neutrality—a significant advantage as manufacturers seek low-carbon material sources.

Sustainability Advantages

• Circular economy approach: Mine waste recovery exemplifies circular economy principles by transforming what was once considered waste into valuable resources, closing material loops.

• Reduction in waste volume: Recovery processes can significantly reduce the physical volume of waste requiring long-term management, decreasing both costs and environmental risks.

• Decreased reliance on environmentally damaging extraction: Recovery can reduce pressure to develop mines in sensitive ecosystems or biodiversity hotspots.

• Cleaner waste streams: Modern processing often leaves behind more environmentally benign waste than original operations, with reduced levels of reactive minerals and potential contaminants.

"The environmental math is compelling—we can extract critical minerals while simultaneously reducing existing environmental liabilities. It's rare to find such alignment between economic and environmental interests." — Environmental policy assessment

How Does This Initiative Address Global Mineral Competition?

The US prioritizes recovery of critical minerals from mine waste as a strategic response to global mineral competition, particularly the dominant position held by China in critical mineral supply chains.

US-China Mineral Dynamics

• China's market dominance: China currently controls production and processing of many critical minerals, including approximately 60% of global rare earth elements production and 80% of rare earth processing capacity.

• Supply chain vulnerabilities: USGS data indicates the United States is 100% import-dependent for 14 critical minerals and more than 50% dependent for dozens more, creating strategic vulnerabilities.

• Processing capacity gaps: Even when minerals are mined domestically, they often must be sent overseas for processing due to limited U.S. capacity—a gap waste recovery initiatives aim to address.

• Technology competition: Critical minerals are essential components in technologies central to economic competition, including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and advanced energy systems.

The waste recovery initiative directly addresses these challenges by developing domestic sources of minerals currently dominated by foreign suppliers.

National Security Implications

• Defense technology requirements: Critical minerals are essential components in advanced weapons systems, communications equipment, and military electronics. For example, rare earth elements are used in precision-guided munitions, night vision systems, and radar technologies.

• Supply disruption risks: Historical export restrictions by China have demonstrated the vulnerability of defense supply chains to foreign policy decisions.

• Technological sovereignty: Domestic mineral supplies support indigenous development of advanced technologies without foreign dependency or potential technology transfer requirements.

• Industrial base resilience: A robust domestic mineral supply strengthens the U.S. defense industrial base, supporting both military readiness and economic security.

By invoking the Defense Production Act in March 2025, the administration explicitly recognized the critical minerals energy security dimension of supply chains, elevating waste recovery projects to strategic importance.

What Role Will Public-Private Partnerships Play?

The success of the mine waste recovery initiative will depend heavily on effective collaboration between government agencies, private industry, research institutions, and affected communities. Public-private partnerships (PPPs) offer a framework for these complex, multi-stakeholder projects.

Investment and Collaboration Models

• Federal funding eligibility: Updated guidance makes waste recovery projects eligible for Department of Energy Loan Programs Office support, similar to the backing provided to companies like Redwood Materials for battery recycling infrastructure.

• Technical assistance programs: Government laboratories including the Critical Materials Institute and National Renewable Energy Laboratory offer technical partnerships to solve processing challenges.

• Research partnerships: Collaborative R&D between industry and government researchers focuses on developing more efficient, environmentally sound recovery methods.

• Streamlined permitting: Expedited review processes specifically for waste recovery projects reduce time-to-market and improve project economics.

• Risk-sharing models: Public-private frameworks can distribute technical and financial risks between government and industry partners, making projects more attractive to investors.

Defense Production Act Title III funding mechanisms further support these partnerships by providing financial incentives for projects with national security implications.

Success Factors for Partnerships

• Clear regulatory frameworks: Successful partnerships require transparent rules governing everything from permitting to profit-sharing and environmental liability.

• Financial incentives alignment: Effective programs must align profit motives with national priorities, creating win-win scenarios for both public and private participants.

• Technology transfer mechanisms: Systems for moving innovations from laboratory to commercial application are essential for accelerating adoption of new recovery techniques.

• Long-term policy stability: Private investment requires confidence in the stability of regulatory and incentive frameworks beyond election cycles.

• Community engagement: Successful projects incorporate local stakeholders, particularly in communities with historical mining legacies.

"The waste recovery initiative represents a rare opportunity for genuine alignment between corporate interests, environmental goals, and national security priorities. The key is designing partnership frameworks that maintain this alignment throughout project lifecycles." — Public policy assessment

FAQ: Critical Minerals Recovery from Mine Waste

What makes a mineral "critical"?

Critical minerals are those essential for economic or national security that have supply chains vulnerable to disruption. The official U.S. critical minerals list (updated biennially) includes rare earth elements, lithium, cobalt, and other minerals vital for advanced technologies, renewable energy, and defense applications. Criticality is determined by factors including import dependency, concentration of production in geopolitically sensitive regions, and lack of viable substitutes.

How much critical mineral potential exists in US mine waste?

While exact figures vary by site and mineral, research by the USGS and state geological surveys has identified significant resources across the country. For example:

• Phosphate mine waste in Idaho and Florida contains recoverable rare earth elements equivalent to approximately 10% of current U.S. annual imports
• Coal refuse piles in Appalachia contain germanium and gallium concentrations sometimes exceeding primary ores
• Copper tailings in Arizona and Utah contain economically significant quantities of tellurium, selenium, and rhenium
• Iron mining waste in Minnesota's Mesabi Range contains titanium, vanadium, and other critical minerals

The total potential represents billions of dollars in mineral value while simultaneously addressing environmental liabilities.

Is recovering minerals from waste economically viable?

Yes, in many cases. As Freeport-McMoRan's 800 million pound copper recovery initiative demonstrates, modern technologies can make previously uneconomic waste profitable. Economic viability depends on several factors:

• Mineral concentration in the waste material
• Processing technology efficiency and cost
• Market prices for the recovered minerals
• Regulatory environment and permitting timelines
• Environmental remediation value captured

Rising mineral prices, improved processing methods, and increasing recognition of the environmental benefits continue to enhance economic viability. Projects often become most attractive when multiple minerals can be recovered simultaneously from the same waste stream.

How does waste recovery compare environmentally to new mining?

Recovery from existing waste typically has a significantly lower environmental footprint than new mining operations for several reasons:

• No new land disturbance required, preserving natural habitats and ecosystems
• Reduced energy consumption per unit of mineral produced (typically

Want to Spot the Next Major Mineral Discovery?

Discover why finding the next De Grey Mining or WA1 Resources could transform your investment portfolio by exploring Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model that delivers real-time alerts on significant ASX mineral discoveries. Visit our dedicated discoveries page to understand how major mineral discoveries can lead to exceptional returns and begin your 30-day free trial today.