Understanding the Global Tailings Management Institute Board: Structure, Purpose, and Impact
The Global Tailings Management Institute (GTMI) represents a watershed moment in mining industry trends, established in January 2025 as a collaborative initiative bringing together key stakeholders committed to preventing catastrophic tailings failures worldwide. This institute emerged directly from the lessons of past disasters and reflects the mining industry's recognition that transformative change in tailings management requires coordinated global action.
What is the Global Tailings Management Institute?
The GTMI was established through the combined efforts of three influential organizations: the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), and the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). This multi-stakeholder organization was created with a specific mandate to oversee the implementation of the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM).
The institute represents more than just another industry body—it signifies a fundamental shift in how the mining sector approaches tailings management, prioritizing safety, accountability, and transparency across operations worldwide. With tailings failures historically among the most devastating mining-related disasters, the GTMI's formation acknowledges that preventing future catastrophes requires coordinated global governance and standardized practices.
Why Was the GTMI Board Formation Necessary?
Historical Context and Industry Challenges
The formation of the GTMI and its board stems directly from a series of catastrophic tailings failures that exposed critical gaps in industry oversight:
- The 2019 Brumadinho dam collapse in Brazil killed 270 people and caused unprecedented environmental devastation, directly triggering the Global Tailings Review
- The 2015 Samarco Fundão dam failure released 43 million cubic meters of mining waste, contaminating 650 kilometers of rivers
- The 2014 Mount Polley disaster in British Columbia spilled 24 million cubic meters of mine waste into local waterways
These failures revealed systemic weaknesses in tailings management practices, highlighting inconsistent standards, inadequate oversight, and insufficient transparency about risks.
"The tragedies at Brumadinho and elsewhere demonstrated that the status quo in tailings management was unacceptable. The formation of the global tailings management institute board represents the industry's commitment to ensuring such disasters never happen again." – Mark Cutifani, GTMI Board Chair
Core Objectives Behind the Board's Formation
The newly appointed board has been tasked with several critical responsibilities that reflect the urgency of addressing tailings risks globally:
- Standardization: Ensuring consistent implementation of the GISTM across different mining jurisdictions, company sizes, and geological contexts
- Continuous improvement: Developing mechanisms to advance tailings management practices based on emerging technologies and lessons learned
- Accountability: Establishing clear lines of responsibility for tailings facility safety throughout their lifecycle
- Transparency: Creating frameworks for disclosure that allow stakeholders to assess tailings risks accurately
- Disaster prevention: Building capacity within the mining sector to identify and address potential failure mechanisms before they manifest
Who Comprises the GTMI's First Board of Directors?
Leadership Structure
The inaugural board features prominent industry figures in key leadership positions who bring decades of relevant experience:
- Chair: Mark Cutifani, former CEO of Anglo American, who has championed mining safety reforms throughout his career
- Deputy Chair: Vicente Mello, Senior Vice-President at AECOM and a recognized expert in tailings management with extensive experience addressing the aftermath of Brazilian tailings disasters
Board Composition and Diversity
The board's composition reflects a deliberate effort to include diverse perspectives, with a makeup that balances technical expertise with community representation:
Geographic Diversity: The board includes significant Brazilian representation (4 members), acknowledging the country's profound experience with tailings disasters and the lessons that must inform global practice. Other members represent countries with major mining operations across six continents.
Gender Balance: The board achieves approximately 40% female representation, ensuring diverse perspectives in an industry historically dominated by men.
Stakeholder Representation: The board includes representatives from:
- Mining industry executives with operational experience
- Technical and academic experts in tailings engineering
- Representatives of communities affected by mining operations
- Indigenous Peoples' advocates familiar with mining impacts
- Mining workforce representatives with safety expertise
- Environmental specialists focused on mining impacts
- Regulatory authorities with governance experience
- Finance sector professionals with investment perspective
Notable Board Members
The selection process attracted over 150 candidates from diverse backgrounds, resulting in appointments including:
- Janis Shandro (Owner/Managing Director of Arrowsmith Gold): An expert in the social dimensions of mining with expertise in community health impacts
- Mutuso Dhliwayo (Executive Director of the Zimbabwe Environmental Law Organisation): Brings perspective on tailings governance in developing economies
- Jacqui Hex (Environmental Scientist at Jones & Wagener): Specializes in geochemical aspects of mine waste management
- Andressa Lanchotti (Public Prosecutor): Played a key role in legal responses to Brazilian tailings disasters
- Edson Krenak (Indigenous Scholar and Advocate): Represents indigenous perspectives on mining impacts
- John Howchin (Special Advisor at the Global Investor Commission on Mining 2030): Brings financial sector perspective on tailings risk
- Jeronimo Covacevich (Tailings Subject Matter Expert at BHP): Contributes operational expertise from one of the world's largest mining companies
How Will the GTMI Board Implement Its Mandate?
Core Programmatic Activities
With the board now established, the GTMI is focusing on developing several key initiatives to drive implementation of the GISTM:
Technical Committee Establishment: The board is creating a specialized technical committee comprising experts in tailings engineering, hydrology, geotechnical analysis, and risk assessment. This committee will develop detailed guidance documents to interpret GISTM requirements across different contexts.
Assurance Framework Development: A comprehensive assurance system is being developed that will include:
- Independent third-party verification protocols
- Qualified auditor certification requirements
- Standardized assessment methodologies
- Clear reporting frameworks for findings
- Remediation tracking for identified deficiencies
Training Programs: The GTMI is developing multi-tiered training programs targeting:
- Executive decision-makers responsible for resource allocation
- Operations managers overseeing tailings facilities
- Technical personnel conducting daily monitoring
- Regulatory staff assessing compliance
- Community representatives monitoring local impacts
Accreditation Systems: The board is establishing certification processes that will:
- Verify tailings facilities against GISTM requirements
- Certify qualified professionals to conduct assessments
- Recognize mining operations meeting exemplary standards
- Provide transparent rating systems for investors and stakeholders
Implementation Strategy
The board's approach to implementation includes several strategic elements:
- Phased rollout: Prioritizing highest-risk facilities for initial compliance verification
- Knowledge sharing: Creating platforms for disseminating best practices across the industry
- Technology acceleration: Promoting adoption of innovative monitoring and risk assessment tools
- Capacity building: Developing resources for smaller mining operations with limited technical expertise
- Stakeholder engagement: Ensuring affected communities have meaningful input into governance processes
What Makes the GTMI Board's Approach Unique?
Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
The GTMI represents a distinctive collaborative approach that brings together stakeholders who have often been at odds regarding mining practices:
- Industry and advocacy integration: The board structure ensures that mining companies and environmental advocates must find common ground
- Technical-social balance: Engineering expertise is complemented by deep understanding of community impacts
- Financial-operational alignment: Investor representatives work alongside operations experts to align economic incentives with safety imperatives
This multi-stakeholder model creates a governance framework where no single interest can dominate decision-making, fostering solutions that balance technical feasibility, community protection, environmental stewardship, and economic viability.
Brazilian Representation and Lessons Learned
The significant Brazilian presence on the board reflects the institute's origins in response to the Brumadinho disaster. As Vicente Mello, the board's Deputy Chair, noted:
"The Brazilian representation on the board is significant and reflects that the institute was born out of the Global Tailings Review, which was formed directly after the tragic Brumadinho dam collapse in 2019. Having the important insights of key individuals that were prominent in responding to the disaster will strengthen the work of the Institute."
This approach ensures that hard-learned lessons from past disasters directly inform future governance. Brazilian board members bring unique perspectives on:
- Emergency response coordination following tailings failures
- Regulatory reforms implemented after major disasters
- Community engagement in high-risk mining contexts
- Remediation approaches for catastrophic environmental damage
- Legal accountability frameworks for tailings management
What Impact Will the GTMI Board Have on Mining Industry Practices?
Industry-Wide Standards Implementation
The board's work will drive consistent application of the GISTM across the global mining landscape, leading to standardized approaches in critical areas:
Facility Design and Construction:
- Minimum factors of safety for structural stability
- Requirements for foundation analysis and preparation
- Specifications for construction material quality
- Monitoring system design requirements
- Dam break analysis methodologies
Operational Management:
- Minimum staffing qualifications for tailings facilities
- Required inspection frequencies and protocols
- Documentation standards for operational decisions
- Change management procedures for facility modifications
- Integration of climate change considerations
Risk Management:
- Standardized risk assessment methodologies
- Requirements for failure mode analysis
- Emergency response planning standards
- Trigger action response plans (TARPs)
- Community notification protocols
Governance Frameworks:
- Board-level oversight requirements
- Accountability assignment for tailings safety
- Independent review requirements
- Documentation and record-keeping standards
- Transparent reporting requirements
Enhanced Safety and Risk Mitigation
By promoting best practices in tailings management, the board aims to achieve measurable safety improvements:
- Reduction in failure incidents: Targeting zero catastrophic failures through enhanced design, monitoring, and governance
- Environmental protection: Minimizing seepage, dust emissions, and other environmental impacts through improved operational practices
- Community safety: Ensuring potentially affected populations understand risks and have evacuation plans
- Workforce protection: Implementing improved safety practices in tailings management operations
Increased Transparency and Accountability
The GTMI's governance framework will enhance disclosure and accountability through:
- Public disclosure requirements: Mining companies will need to provide detailed information about tailings facilities, including design parameters, risk assessments, and monitoring data
- Independent verification: Third-party audits will validate company claims about tailings safety
- Clear responsibility assignment: Organizations must designate accountable executives for tailings management
- Consequence mechanisms: The GTMI will develop frameworks for addressing non-compliance, potentially including public reporting and investor advisories
What Challenges Might the GTMI Board Face?
Implementation Hurdles
The board will likely encounter several significant challenges in implementing the GISTM globally:
Regulatory Variation:
- Different countries have vastly different mining regulations
- Some jurisdictions lack technical capacity for enforcement
- Conflicting legal requirements may complicate standardization
- Political considerations may affect regulatory alignment with GISTM
Technical Capacity Disparities:
- Smaller mining companies may lack expertise for implementation
- Remote operations may struggle with monitoring requirements
- Access to qualified personnel varies significantly by region
- Technical resource constraints may limit compliance capacity
Economic Considerations:
- Implementation costs may be substantial for some operations
- Market pressures may compete with safety investments
- Short-term financial thinking can undermine long-term safety
- Cost disparities between companies create competitive concerns
Legacy Facilities:
- Older tailings facilities were designed to different standards
- Historical documentation may be incomplete
- Retrofitting existing facilities presents unique challenges
- Abandoned tailings sites may have unclear ownership
Measuring Success
Determining the effectiveness of the GTMI's work will require sophisticated metrics and evaluation systems:
Performance Indicators:
- Tracking implementation rates across different mining regions
- Monitoring incident frequency and severity
- Measuring improvements in disclosure quality
- Assessing emergency preparedness improvements
- Evaluating community confidence in tailings management
Baseline Establishment:
- Documenting current global tailings facility conditions
- Assessing existing governance practices across companies
- Cataloging current disclosure practices and gaps
- Identifying high-risk facilities requiring priority attention
Progress Monitoring:
- Developing systems to track implementation milestones
- Creating mechanisms for reporting compliance challenges
- Establishing feedback loops for continuous improvement
- Designing longitudinal studies of safety performance
How Does the GTMI Board Fit Into Broader Mining Industry Governance?
Relationship to Existing Frameworks
The GTMI complements other governance mechanisms while addressing specific gaps in tailings oversight:
National Regulations:
- GISTM implementation may inform regulatory reforms
- GTMI can provide technical assistance to regulatory bodies
- The standard creates a global baseline that regulations can reference
- Certification can simplify regulatory compliance verification
Company Management Systems:
- GISTM integrates with existing environmental management systems
- The standard provides specificity for tailings-specific controls
- Implementation frameworks create consistency across operations
- GTMI resources can strengthen internal governance processes
Industry Initiatives:
- Aligns with broader efforts like the Mining Association of Canada's Towards Sustainable Mining program
- Complements the International Council on Mining and Metals' Performance Expectations
- Builds upon the investor-led Tailings Disclosure Initiative
- Supports the UN Sustainable Development Goals relevant to mining
Potential for Broader Influence
The GTMI model could potentially influence governance in other aspects of mining:
Water Management:
- The multi-stakeholder governance approach could address water quality and quantity issues
- Risk assessment methodologies could transfer to water management contexts
- Disclosure frameworks could expand to include comprehensive water reporting
Mine Closure:
- The lifecycle approach to tailings could inform more comprehensive closure planning
- Financial assurance mechanisms could apply to broader reclamation requirements
- Community engagement models could strengthen mine reclamation innovations
Community Relations:
- Transparency principles could extend to broader social impact reporting
- Multi-stakeholder governance could inform community development agreements
- Independent verification approaches could strengthen social performance claims
Environmental Performance:
- Technical committees could address other environmental challenges
- Certification systems could expand to broader environmental management
- Risk assessment approaches could apply to biodiversity and ecosystem impacts
FAQs About the GTMI Board
When was the GTMI established and why?
The Global Tailings Management Institute was established in January 2025 as a direct response to catastrophic tailings management failures in the mining industry. The institute was created following the recommendations of the Global Tailings Review, which was initiated after the 2019 Brumadinho dam collapse in Brazil that killed 270 people and caused massive environmental damage. The GTMI's formation represents the mining industry's acknowledgment that preventing future disasters requires coordinated global governance of tailings facilities.
How were board members selected?
Board members were selected through a comprehensive process that attracted over 150 candidates from various stakeholder groups. The selection process was facilitated by the GTMI's co-founders: the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), and the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI). The selection committee prioritized candidates with diverse expertise, geographic representation, gender balance, and stakeholder perspectives to ensure the board could effectively address the complex challenges of tailings management across different contexts.
What specific powers does the GTMI board have?
While the GTMI board doesn't have direct regulatory authority, it wields significant influence through several mechanisms:
- Standard development: Authority to interpret, update, and expand the GISTM
- Certification frameworks: Power to establish requirements for compliance verification
- Accreditation systems: Ability to recognize qualified professionals and organizations
- Information disclosure: Capacity to require and publish tailings facility data
- Investor guidance: Influence over investment criteria related to tailings risk
- Technical direction: Leadership in defining best practices and technologies
The board's authority stems from the collective commitment of major mining companies, investors, and other stakeholders to implement the GISTM and support the GTMI's governance framework.
How will the GTMI's work affect mining companies?
Mining companies will experience several significant impacts from the GTMI's work:
- Operational requirements: Companies will need to align their tailings management practices with the GISTM, potentially requiring substantial changes to design, monitoring, and governance approaches
- Financial implications: Implementation may require investments in infrastructure upgrades, monitoring technology, staffing, training, and reporting systems
- Risk profile changes: Companies demonstrating compliance may benefit from improved risk assessments, potentially reducing insurance costs and improving access to capital
- Disclosure obligations: Enhanced transparency requirements will increase public information about tailings facilities and their associated risks
- Technical capacity needs: Organizations will need to develop or acquire expertise aligned with GISTM requirements
Will the GTMI's standards be mandatory?
The GISTM itself is not legally binding legislation, but it is becoming an industry expectation through several mechanisms:
- Member commitments: All ICMM member companies have committed to implementing the standard at their operations
- Investor requirements: Major investors representing over $10 trillion in assets have indicated they expect mining companies to implement the standard
- Regulatory influence: Some jurisdictions are beginning to incorporate elements of the GISTM into their
Want to Capitalise on the Next Major Mineral Discovery?
Stay ahead of the market with Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model, which instantly identifies significant ASX mineral discoveries and transforms complex data into actionable investment insights. Explore why major mineral discoveries can lead to substantial returns by visiting Discovery Alert's dedicated discoveries page and begin your 30-day free trial today.
