What Is the Oil Futures "Smile" Pattern?
The Brent forward curve currently displays an unusual "smile" shape, characterized by a downward slope across the first nine contracts and an upward slope thereafter. This distinctive pricing anomaly represents a 0.5–1.0 USD/bbl shift between near-term and long-term contracts in oil futures. According to Morgan Stanley analysts Martijn Rats and Charlotte Firkins, this pattern has "little historical precedent" in oil markets.
While similar structures appeared briefly during the 2008 financial crisis, the current pattern is more sustained, having persisted for over six months. This unusual formation has market participants closely monitoring its implications for future price movements and trading strategies.
"This dual structure suggests markets are pricing in immediate supply tightness alongside a structural surplus by 2026," note Rats and Firkins, highlighting the contradictory signals embedded in this rare oil futures pattern.
Technical Characteristics of the "Smile"
The "smile" pattern combines two distinct pricing phenomena in futures markets. The first segment shows backwardation (downward slope) in near-term contracts, indicating inventory drawdowns and refinery demand exceeding current supply. This typically signals immediate market tightness and supply constraints.
The second segment displays contango (upward slope) in longer-dated contracts, reflecting expectations of OPEC+ production increases and renewable energy substitution reducing demand beyond 2025. The inflection point between these opposing forces occurs around the ninth contract in the current market structure.
This contradictory pricing mechanism creates unique challenges and opportunities for market participants attempting to interpret the future direction of oil prices.
Why Does This Rare Pattern Matter for Oil Markets?
The unusual "smile" configuration in oil futures carries significant implications for energy markets and investment strategies. Near-term Brent backwardation has tightened to 1.2 USD/bbl for Q2 2025 versus 0.8 USD/bbl in Q4 2024, indicating strengthening immediate demand. Simultaneously, long-dated contracts for December 2026 trade at a 3.4 USD/bbl discount to spot prices—the widest gap since the pandemic-driven market disruptions of 2020.
Energy Aspects' Amrita Sen explains: "The 'smile' reflects a transitional market—tight today but awash with oil in 18 months due to delayed projects coming online." This creates a dichotomy in positioning strategies for different time horizons.
Dual Market Signals
The pattern sends contradictory signals about market conditions. Near-term backwardation indicates current market tightness and immediate supply constraints, suggesting strong demand relative to available supply. This typically encourages inventory drawdowns and immediate consumption rather than storage.
Conversely, longer-term contango signals expectations of a "meaningful surplus" developing in the future. This aligns with the International Energy Agency's 2025 demand growth forecast of 1.1 million barrels per day, suggesting supply will eventually outpace consumption. The market effectively prices in two distinct future scenarios simultaneously, creating unique hedging and trading opportunities.
Historical Context and Precedent
The "smile" structure differs significantly from typical market dynamics explained. During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, oil markets experienced steep contango across the entire curve as storage tanks filled amid collapsing demand, creating a uniform upward slope. The current pattern, however, reflects structural factors rather than acute crisis conditions.
Previous instances of similar curve structures typically occurred during major market transitions, such as the 2008 financial crisis, but rarely lasted more than a few weeks. The persistence of the current pattern suggests fundamental shifts in long-term supply-demand dynamics rather than temporary market dislocations.
What Factors Are Creating This Unusual Market Structure?
Multiple forces are conspiring to create this rare market configuration, with distinct factors influencing near-term tightness and long-term surplus expectations.
Near-Term Supply Constraints
Current production limitations significantly impact immediate pricing. U.S. shale growth has stalled at approximately 12.8 million barrels per day (bpd) heading into 2025, while OPEC+ maintains substantial production cuts totaling 3.6 million bpd. These voluntary restrictions create artificial scarcity in current markets.
Geopolitical factors further contribute to short-term tightness. Ukrainian drone strikes have reduced Russian refinery throughput by approximately 12% in Q1 2025, creating particular strain in distillate markets. Additionally, U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) inventories sit at 350 million barrels—35% below 2020 levels—limiting buffer stocks that could ease temporary shortages.
Seasonal demand patterns also influence near-term market tightness, with summer driving season in the Northern Hemisphere typically increasing gasoline consumption and placing additional pressure on refined product inventories.
Long-Term Surplus Expectations
Several major production capacity expansions anticipated in coming years are pressuring longer-dated contracts. Guyana's prolific Stabroek Block is projected to add 1.2 million bpd by 2026, while Brazil's pre-salt fields target production of 5.4 million bpd by 2027. These massive projects represent significant additions to global supply.
China's 2025 refinery expansion plans, adding approximately 1.8 million bpd of processing capacity, will increase the country's ability to absorb near-term supply but potentially contribute to product oversupply in global markets.
Demand forecast adjustments also affect long-term price expectations, with electric vehicle adoption and natural gas substitution expected to moderate oil consumption growth beyond 2026. These structural shifts in energy consumption patterns contribute to bearish sentiment for distant contract months.
How Are Traders Responding to the "Smile" Pattern?
The unusual curve structure has prompted sophisticated trading strategies as market participants attempt to capitalize on the opposing price signals across different timeframes.
Trading Strategies and Opportunities
Hedge funds have increased net long positions in December 2026 contracts by 22% as of April 2025, effectively betting on contango widening. Calendar spreads between December 2025 and December 2026 have reached -4.1 USD/bbl, the steepest level since 2014, creating opportunities for spread trading.
"Producers are hedging 2026 output at 72 USD/bbl, locking in margins before expected price declines," notes Vitol's Chris Bake, highlighting how upstream companies are securing future revenue streams while prices remain relatively favorable.
A typical "smile" arbitrage might involve shorting near-term contracts, establishing long positions at the inflection point in mid-curve, and shorting long-dated futures. This strategy aims to profit from both the backwardation in front-month contracts and the contango in deferred months.
Market Sentiment Indicators
Institutional investors are increasingly focusing on spread positioning rather than outright directional bets. Options market activity reflects growing uncertainty, with increased demand for both calls on near-term contracts and puts on longer-dated futures.
Speculative positioning shows divergence, with money managers holding net long positions in front-month contracts while building short positions in deferred months. This bifurcated approach reflects the competing narratives embedded in the current curve structure.
What Are the Implications for Energy Market Participants?
The "smile" pattern creates distinct challenges and opportunities for various stakeholders in energy markets, requiring tailored strategies for producers and consumers.
For Oil Producers
Strategic hedging decisions have taken center stage for producers facing this unusual curve. ExxonMobil has hedged approximately 40% of its planned 2026 output at $70-75 per barrel, compared to just 25% in 2024, demonstrating increased focus on locking in forward prices.
Investment timing decisions are becoming more critical in the current environment. Projects with short payback periods may be prioritized over long-term developments due to concerns about future price erosion. This could exacerbate supply cycles by deterring investment in projects with extended time horizons.
Production scheduling optimization presents opportunities to maximize revenue by accelerating output while near-term prices remain elevated. Companies with flexible production capacity can adjust their output timeline to capitalize on current backwardation while hedging against future contango.
For Oil Consumers
Procurement strategies are evolving in response to the curve structure. Delta Air Lines has secured approximately 45% of its projected 2026 jet fuel requirements at $2.14 per gallon, below current spot prices, taking advantage of the contango in deferred contracts.
Hedging approaches for managing price risk increasingly focus on calendar spreads rather than outright price levels. This allows consumers to benefit from both current market dynamics and future price expectations without taking excessive directional risk.
Budget planning considerations must account for the divergent price signals across different time horizons. Organizations with multi-year planning cycles face the challenge of reconciling the conflicting messages sent by backwardation in near-term contracts and contango in longer-dated futures.
How Might This Pattern Evolve in Coming Months?
The "smile" pattern's persistence and potential resolution pathways represent key considerations for market participants developing forward-looking strategies.
Potential Curve Transformations
Morgan Stanley forecasts Brent crude prices at $85 per barrel in Q3 2025, falling to $68 per barrel by Q2 2026, suggesting the current curve shape may persist or even steepen. RBC's Helima Croft indicates that "a Saudi production hike above 10 million bpd would 'break' the smile into standard contango," highlighting the influence of OPEC+ policy decisions.
Critical indicators to monitor include the outcomes of OPEC+'s June 2025 meeting, U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve replenishment rates, and China's diesel export quotas, all of which could significantly influence curve dynamics in coming months.
Market participants should consider multiple scenarios, mapping potential OPEC+ decisions to resulting curve structures. For instance, additional production cuts of 500,000 bpd could steepen backwardation, while maintaining the status quo might preserve the current smile pattern.
Market Balancing Mechanisms
Supply and demand forces typically work to resolve pricing anomalies through physical arbitrage and inventory movements. The current backwardation encourages inventory drawdowns, while contango in deferred contracts supports future production growth—potentially accelerating the transition to surplus conditions.
Price elasticity effects will influence market rebalancing, with higher near-term prices potentially curbing consumption while lower long-dated prices may discourage investment in marginal production. This self-correcting mechanism could gradually normalize the curve structure over time.
Storage economics in the current environment discourage physical stockpiling despite expectations of future surpluses. This paradox could delay the market's ability to smoothly transition between tight current conditions and anticipated future abundance.
Expert Analysis and Market Forecasts
Leading financial institutions and energy analysts offer diverse perspectives on the implications of the current "smile" pattern for future market conditions.
Morgan Stanley's Market Perspective
Morgan Stanley's commodity research team has conducted detailed quantitative assessment of the current market structure, identifying specific supply and demand imbalances driving the unusual curve shape. Their analysis points to a potential 3-5 million bpd surplus developing by 2027 if all planned production projects proceed on schedule.
The investment bank's forward-looking projections highlight risks of price volatility as markets transition from current tightness to future abundance. Their models suggest the curve could normalize through a combination of near-term price declines and modest appreciation in longer-dated contracts.
Industry Expert Viewpoints
Goldman Sachs offers a contrasting macroeconomic interpretation, suggesting "the smile implies a 60% probability of recession by 2026, versus 35% in bond markets." This perspective views the curve structure as a leading indicator of broader economic conditions rather than purely oil-specific factors.
Citi's Ed Morse notes that "long-dated prices below $70 per barrel discourage investment in non-OPEC supply, perpetuating cycles" of scarcity and surplus. This cyclical interpretation suggests the current pattern may resolve through underinvestment rather than oversupply.
BP's Energy Outlook 2025 provides a different long-term perspective, projecting demand plateauing post-2030 rather than declining precipitously. This view contrasts with Morgan Stanley's surplus narrative, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding future consumption patterns.
FAQ About Oil Futures' "Smile" Pattern
What causes backwardation in oil futures?
Backwardation typically emerges from supply and demand imbalances creating immediate market tightness. Current examples include OPEC+ production cuts, geopolitical disruptions affecting Russian refineries, and limited strategic petroleum reserves.
The concept of "convenience yield" also contributes to backwardation. As defined in CME Group's 2025 glossary, this represents the premium market participants place on having immediate physical access to oil versus future delivery, particularly during periods of perceived scarcity.
Risk premium considerations in near-term contracts further steepen backwardation, as uncertainty about immediate supply disruptions can elevate prompt prices relative to deferred contracts.
Why would the market expect surplus conditions in the future?
Production capacity expansion projections form the primary basis for surplus expectations. Major projects in Guyana, Brazil, and other non-OPEC producers are scheduled to add significant volumes in 2026-2027, potentially exceeding demand growth.
Demand growth forecast adjustments contribute to bearish long-term sentiment. Electric vehicle adoption, renewable energy substitution, and energy efficiency improvements are expected to moderate consumption growth in developed markets.
Technological and policy factors affecting long-term oil consumption include carbon pricing mechanisms, fuel economy standards, and alternative energy incentives that could structurally reduce petroleum demand growth rates over time.
How does this pattern affect physical oil trading?
The current curve structure creates challenges for storage economics and physical arbitrage, as the carrying costs of holding inventory typically exceed the potential price appreciation implied by contango in distant contracts.
Effects on refinery margins have been significant, with U.S. Gulf Coast cracking margins falling to $18 per barrel in April 2025 from $24 per barrel in 2024 due to backwardation. This compression reduces incentives for increasing refinery throughput despite strong current demand.
Transportation economics and trade flows are also impacted, as the curve structure influences decisions about cargo routing, blending operations, and arbitrage opportunities between regional markets.
What similar patterns have occurred in other commodity markets?
Natural gas markets experienced a "super contango" in 2022 following the Freeport LNG facility outage, creating a temporary but extreme version of the current oil market pattern. The resolution occurred through increased production and normalized LNG exports.
Metals markets occasionally display similar structures during transitions between supply regimes, particularly in copper and aluminum during periods of smelter capacity expansion.
Cross-commodity correlation considerations highlight how interconnected energy markets may experience similar structural shifts as global commodities insights reveal ongoing decarbonization efforts, potentially creating analogous pricing patterns across fossil fuels.
Key Takeaways on Oil Futures' Unusual "Smile" Structure
The rare "smile" pattern in oil futures signals contradictory market conditions across different time horizons, with near-term tightness coexisting alongside longer-term oversupply concerns. This structure challenges conventional trading strategies and risk management approaches.
Current market dynamics suggest imminent supply constraints are likely to persist through 2025, while substantial production increases scheduled for 2026-2027 could create meaningful surpluses thereafter. This temporal disconnect creates both challenges and opportunities for market participants.
As this unusual pattern evolves, monitoring key indicators including OPEC+ production decisions, emerging market demand trends, and project completion timelines will provide critical insights into the pace and magnitude of the anticipated market rebalancing. Additionally, understanding the impact of Trump's energy policies and developing effective geopolitical strategies will be crucial for investors navigating these complex market conditions.
Disclaimer: This article represents analysis based on current market conditions and expert opinions. Future oil price movements and curve structures remain subject to significant uncertainty and multiple factors beyond those discussed here. Readers should consider multiple scenarios and consult professional advisors before making investment or operational decisions based on this information.
Ready to Capitalise on Future Mineral Discoveries?
Stay ahead of the market with Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model, delivering instant notifications on significant ASX mineral discoveries and turning complex data into actionable investment insights. Explore why major discoveries can lead to substantial returns by visiting our dedicated discoveries page.
