What Is the US-China Trade War and How Did It Begin?
The trade war between US and China represents one of the most consequential economic conflicts in recent history. It began during the Trump administration when Trump's reshaping policies were implemented to address perceived unfair trade practices by China. What started as economic disagreements has evolved into a comprehensive strategic rivalry with far-reaching implications for the global economy.
Origins of the Trade Conflict
The trade war didn't emerge suddenly but developed from long-standing economic tensions between the world's two largest economies. Several key factors contributed to its escalation:
Trade deficit concerns: The US trade deficit with China surpassed $375 billion in 2017, becoming a major point of contention for American policymakers.
Intellectual property disputes: Under China's "Made in China 2025" initiative, allegations of intellectual property theft intensified. The US Trade Representative estimated these practices cost American companies approximately $50 billion annually.
Market access limitations: While Chinese companies enjoyed relatively open access to US markets, American firms faced significant restrictions in key Chinese sectors including telecommunications, financial services, and healthcare.
Industrial policy disagreements: China's state-supported industrial strategies created tensions as Beijing provided subsidies and preferential treatment to domestic companies in strategic sectors.
From Economic Competition to Strategic Rivalry
What began as trade disagreements has evolved into a multidimensional contest for global influence:
Tariff escalation: The US imposed tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act, initially targeting $250 billion worth of Chinese goods in 2018. China retaliated with tariffs on $110 billion of US exports, strategically focusing on agricultural products from politically sensitive regions.
Technology dominance battles: The conflict expanded into a technology competition, with the US restricting Huawei's access to semiconductor technologies while China accelerated its semiconductor self-sufficiency goals.
Security concerns: Military posturing in the South China Sea and Indo-Pacific alliances further underscored that this rivalry extends far beyond trade.
How Have Tariff Policies Shaped the US-China Economic Relationship?
The implementation of tariffs has fundamentally altered bilateral trade patterns and created significant economic consequences for both nations.
The US Tariff Strategy
The United States deployed tariffs in strategic waves:
Section 232 tariffs (2018): 25% duties on steel and 10% on aluminum imports, citing national security concerns under rarely-used trade law provisions.
Section 301 tariffs: Four separate tranches covering approximately $550 billion in Chinese goods, with rates peaking at 25% for many industrial components and finished goods.
Targeted expansion: Strategic targeting of industries where China sought technological leadership, including semiconductors, telecommunications, and renewable energy equipment.
Consumer impact: These measures raised US consumer prices by approximately 0.5% annually. Following tariff implementation, washing machine prices surged 12%, providing a clear example of costs passed to consumers.
China's Retaliatory Measures
China responded with calculated countermeasures:
Agricultural targeting: Chinese soybean imports from the US fell by 50% in 2018, deliberately impacting rural American communities.
Rare earth leverage: China wielded its dominance in rare earth elements (controlling 80% of global production) as a strategic tool, threatening supply restrictions for industries like electronics and defense.
Non-tariff barriers: Regulatory hurdles for US companies operating in China increased, with approval delays in sectors like automotive and pharmaceuticals.
Regional trade redirection: China strengthened trading relationships with neighboring Asian economies and the EU to offset reduced US trade.
Economic Impact of Tariff Escalation
The tariff war created widespread economic ripple effects:
Bilateral trade contraction: US-China trade dropped approximately 15% by 2019, even before pandemic disruptions.
Global growth impact: The IMF estimated the trade conflict slowed global GDP growth by 0.8 percentage points.
Supply chain disruptions: Manufacturing costs increased by 10-30% for electronics and machinery reliant on cross-border component sourcing.
Market volatility: The S&P 500 fell 6% in Q4 2018 due to trade war concerns, while Apple's stock plunged 23% in just five days following major tariff announcements.
What Are the Broader Economic Implications of the Trade War?
The trade conflict has extended far beyond bilateral trade, affecting global economic structures and relationships.
Global Supply Chain Restructuring
One of the most profound impacts has been the reconfiguration of global supply chains:
Mexico's manufacturing surge: Mexican manufacturing exports to the US grew approximately 40% between 2018-2023 as companies sought tariff-free alternatives to Chinese production.
Vietnam's electronics boom: Vietnamese electronics exports rose 25% annually, as multinationals shifted production from China to avoid tariffs.
Reshoring challenges: US firms reported 15-20% cost increases when returning production from China to domestic facilities, often requiring substantial automation investments.
Supply chain resilience focus: Companies prioritized supply chain security over cost efficiency, accepting higher operational expenses to reduce geopolitical risk.
Financial Market Volatility
Financial markets have responded dramatically to trade war developments:
Safe haven assets: Gold market analysis shows prices surged 35% in 2025, reaching $3,500 per ounce as investors sought safety amid geopolitical uncertainty.
Equity market turbulence: The S&P 500's volatility index (VIX) spiked to 40 during major tariff announcement periods, reflecting heightened investor anxiety.
Currency fluctuations: The Chinese yuan depreciated approximately 10% against the dollar in 2025, raising concerns about competitive devaluation.
Sector rotation: Investors shifted from export-dependent companies to domestically-focused businesses, creating significant valuation disparities between sectors.
Inflation and Monetary Policy Challenges
The trade war has complicated central bank policies worldwide:
Inflationary pressure: Tariffs contributed approximately 1.2 percentage points to US inflation in 2025, complicating the Federal Reserve's efforts to control price increases.
Policy divergence: The Fed's 2025 pause on rate cuts contrasted with the ECB's more dovish stance, highlighting how trade tensions create divergent monetary policy paths.
Bond market distortions: Safe-haven flows pushed US Treasury yields lower despite inflationary pressures, creating policy implementation challenges.
Emerging market stress: Currency volatility increased borrowing costs for dollar-denominated debt in developing economies, exacerbating economic instability.
How Has the Trade War Affected Regional Economic Alliances?
The US-China trade conflict has catalyzed significant shifts in regional economic partnerships and alliances.
Asia's Economic Realignment
Asian economies have responded strategically to the trade tensions:
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): Implemented in 2020, RCEP created the world's largest trade bloc, covering approximately 30% of global GDP and reducing dependence on Western markets.
Intra-Asian trade growth: Trade between Asian nations expanded 18% in 2025, reducing reliance on US markets and creating more regionally integrated supply chains.
Technology cooperation: Asian nations increased collaboration in strategic sectors like semiconductors, with South Korea and Japan forming joint development initiatives despite historical tensions.
Infrastructure connectivity: China's Belt and Road Initiative accelerated, with $1.3 trillion in commitments across Asia by 2025, cementing economic interdependence.
North American Trade Dynamics
The trade war has influenced North American economic relationships:
USMCA implementation: The successor to NAFTA increased the regional value content requirement for auto parts to 75%, encouraging North American production.
Mexican manufacturing boom: Mexico attracted approximately $30 billion in manufacturing FDI between 2020-2025 as companies sought tariff-free access to the US market.
Critical minerals cooperation: The US, Canada, and Mexico developed integrated critical minerals strategies, with joint projects receiving $5 billion in financing by 2025.
Regulatory harmonization: Increased alignment of product standards and regulations reduced non-tariff barriers within North America, facilitating regional trade.
European Strategic Positioning
European nations have adopted a balanced approach:
Critical Raw Materials Act: Launched in 2023, this initiative aims to source 20% of strategic minerals domestically by 2030, reducing dependency on both Chinese and American supply chains.
ASEAN partnership: EU exports to ASEAN nations grew 12% in 2025 as European companies sought to diversify their Asian market presence beyond China.
Industrial policy revival: The EU implemented $300 billion in industrial subsidies for strategic sectors like semiconductors, renewable energy, and pharmaceuticals.
Investment screening mechanisms: European countries strengthened foreign investment review processes, blocking 22 Chinese acquisitions in strategic sectors between 2020-2025.
What Role Does Gold Play During US-China Trade Tensions?
Gold has emerged as a significant beneficiary of the trade war between US and China, demonstrating its enduring role as a safe-haven asset during geopolitical uncertainty.
Gold's Price Performance During Trade Tensions
The precious metal has shown remarkable strength during periods of heightened trade conflict:
Record price levels: Gold reached $3,500 per ounce in 2025, representing a 35% increase directly correlated with escalating trade tensions.
Outperformance vs. equities: Gold outperformed the S&P 500 by approximately 40% year-to-date in 2025 during peak trade friction periods.
Volatility buffer: Gold's price volatility remained 40% lower than major equity indices during trade dispute escalations, reinforcing its stability appeal.
Currency correlation: Gold's price increases accelerated during periods of yuan depreciation, reflecting its role as a hedge against currency manipulation concerns.
Central Bank Gold Acquisition Trends
National central banks have accelerated their gold purchases during the trade war period:
Record acquisition volume: Central banks purchased approximately 1,200 tonnes of gold in 2025, representing the highest annual total in over 50 years.
Diversification from dollars: China increased its official gold reserves by 300 tonnes in 2025 alone, part of a broader strategy to reduce dollar exposure.
New market participants: Previously inactive central banks from countries like Poland, Hungary, and Thailand entered the gold market with significant purchases.
Reserve composition shifts: The percentage of gold in central bank reserves increased from a global average of 15% in 2018 to 22% by 2025.
Investment Demand for Physical Gold
Retail and institutional investors have shown increased interest in physical gold:
ETF holdings expansion: Gold ETF holdings reached approximately 4,000 tonnes in 2025, nearly doubling from 2018 levels.
Coin and bar premiums: Physical gold premiums over spot prices reached 15% during periods of trade crisis, reflecting intensified retail demand.
Institutional allocation: Pension funds increased average gold allocations from 0.5% to 2.5% between 2018-2025 as a portfolio stabilizer.
Regional demand shifts: Asian gold demand grew 28% in 2025, led by Chinese investors seeking protection from potential currency depreciation.
How Are Mining Companies Responding to the Trade War Environment?
The mining sector, particularly precious metals and critical minerals, has been significantly impacted by the trade conflict.
Gold Mining Company Performance
Gold producers have seen substantial benefits from the trade war environment:
Margin expansion: Companies like Agnico Eagle reported all-in sustaining costs (AISC) of $1,186 per ounce in Q1 2025, yielding margins of $2,300 per ounce at $3,500 gold prices.
Shareholder returns focus: Newmont allocated $1 billion for share buybacks in 2025, targeting a 5% reduction in outstanding shares while increasing dividends by 40%.
M&A acceleration: The gold mining sector saw $45 billion in consolidation activity in 2025, as companies deployed strong cash flows to acquire reserves.
Capital expenditure revival: After years of limited development, gold miners increased exploration and development spending by 35% in 2025 to capitalize on higher prices.
Strategic Minerals and Critical Materials
Companies producing strategic minerals have gained increased attention:
Supply chain reorientation: US critical mineral imports from China fell 25% in 2025 as domestic and allied nation sources were prioritized.
Government support: Companies like American Tungsten (DEMRF) secured $35 million in Department of Energy grants for developing Idaho tungsten projects deemed strategically important.
Price volatility benefits: Prices for critical minerals like lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements experienced 50-200% increases during trade tensions, benefiting producers outside China.
Project acceleration: China's export restrictions on critical minerals led to development timelines for projects in politically aligned countries being shortened by 30% due to streamlined permitting and financing support.
Mining Investment Trends
The investment landscape for mining companies has evolved:
Valuation premiums: Companies operating in politically stable jurisdictions commanded 30-40% valuation premiums compared to those with significant Chinese exposure.
ESG integration: Mining companies increasingly emphasized environmental and governance credentials to attract Western investment as China-exposed operations faced scrutiny.
Financing availability: Critical mineral projects in North America secured $12 billion in development financing in 2025, triple the 2018 level.
Strategic partnerships: Mining companies formed alliances with technology and manufacturing firms, with 45 new vertically integrated supply chain partnerships announced in 2025.
What Are the Long-Term Economic Consequences of Prolonged Trade Tensions?
The extended nature of the trade conflict is creating structural changes in the global economy that will persist regardless of future policy shifts.
Deglobalization and Economic Fragmentation
The trade war has accelerated the fragmentation of the global economic system:
Trade intensity reduction: Trade as a percentage of global GDP dropped from 61% in 2018 to 55% by 2025, reversing decades of globalization.
Technology bifurcation: China's Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) successfully produced 7nm chips despite US sanctions, demonstrating the emergence of parallel technology ecosystems.
Dual standards development: Incompatible technical standards emerged in 5G telecommunications, electric vehicles, and artificial intelligence between Chinese and Western spheres.
Financial system divergence: China's Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) processed 18% of international transactions by 2025, challenging SWIFT's dominance.
Manufacturing Reshoring and Nearshoring
Production patterns are shifting in response to trade uncertainties:
US manufacturing revival: American manufacturing employment grew by 1.2 million jobs between 2020-2025, though automation requirements added approximately 20% to production costs.
Regional specialization: Mexico developed specialized manufacturing capabilities in electronics, automotive, and medical devices, with productivity increasing 30% in these sectors.
Advanced manufacturing focus: Reshored operations emphasized automation and digitalization, with US factories deploying 40% more industrial robots per worker than in 2018.
Resilience investment: Companies invested $180 billion in supply chain resilience measures globally in 2025, accepting 15% higher operational costs to reduce disruption risks.
Investment and Capital Flow Patterns
Capital allocation strategies are adapting to the new environment:
Risk premium differentials: Investments in China-exposed sectors commanded 200-300 basis point higher return requirements compared to domestic alternatives.
Strategic sector concentration: Venture capital investment in semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and biotechnology doubled between 2018-2025 in both the US and China as nations raced for technological supremacy.
Reduced cross-border investment: Direct investment between the US and China fell 65% from 2018 levels, though investment from each into third countries increased.
Infrastructure prioritization: Both nations accelerated domestic infrastructure spending, with the US Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and China's "dual circulation" strategy directing trillions toward domestic economic foundations.
How Might the US-China Trade Relationship Evolve?
The future trajectory of US-China trade relations remains uncertain, with several potential scenarios emerging.
Potential Scenarios for Future Relations
The trade relationship could develop along several different paths:
Managed competition: A scenario where limited cooperation occurs in areas like climate policy while technology decoupling continues, with regular dialogue maintaining economic stability despite strategic rivalry.
Accelerated decoupling: Further separation of the two economies across multiple dimensions, potentially triggered by tensions over Taiwan or technological competition, leading to comprehensive investment restrictions and export controls.
Selective reengagement: Targeted cooperation in specific industries like renewable energy and public health, while maintaining competitive postures in strategic sectors such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and biotechnology.
Crisis-driven realignment: A major economic or security crisis forcing fundamental reconsideration of the relationship, potentially including a Taiwan contingency that drives rapid supply chain repatriation and comprehensive economic separation.
Critical Factors That Will Shape Future Developments
Several key variables will influence how the relationship evolves:
Leadership transitions: Changes in political leadership in both countries will significantly impact policy direction, with potential shifts in approach following election cycles.
Technological breakthroughs: Advances in key technologies like artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and biotechnology could accelerate competition or create new interdependencies.
Third-country positioning: How nations like India, Vietnam, Indonesia, and European powers position themselves between the US and China will shape the contours of economic blocs.
Domestic economic pressures: Internal challenges like China's property sector troubles or US inflationary pressures could force policy recalibrations to address
Looking to Gain Early Access to Major Mineral Discoveries?
Discovery Alert's proprietary Discovery IQ model provides instant notifications on significant ASX mineral discoveries, empowering investors to identify actionable opportunities ahead of the broader market. Begin your 30-day free trial today at Discovery Alert and position yourself for potential substantial returns.
